Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/33916
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorZebin, Tahmina-
dc.contributor.authorWu, Jinyan-
dc.contributor.authorColecchia, Federico-
dc.contributor.authorShinhmar, Sonia-
dc.contributor.authorBondaronek, Paulina-
dc.contributor.authorPotts, Henry WW-
dc.contributor.authorTucker, Allan-
dc.contributor.authorSpinelli, Gabriella-
dc.date.accessioned2026-09-30T09:06:16Z-
dc.date.available2026-09-30T09:06:16Z-
dc.date.issued2026-08-24-
dc.identifier.citationZebin, T. et al. (2026) 'Healthcare AI risk management: an innovator-informed approach from frameworks to practical worksheets for proportionate regulatory evidence capture', BMJ Innovations, 0(ahead of print), pp. 1–9. doi: 10.1136/bmjinnov-2026-001643.en_GB
dc.identifier.issn2055-8074-
dc.identifier.urihttps://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/33916-
dc.descriptionData availability statement: All data relevant to the study are included in the article or uploaded as supplementary information. The framework mapping and worksheet development are fully described in the manuscript; example worksheet templates are available from the RADIANTCERSI’s official website. The underlying stakeholder consultation data are not publicly available because they contain potentially identifiable or confidential information.en_GB
dc.description.abstractIntroduction: Artificial intelligence (AI)-enabled healthcare systems introduce clinical safety, operational and governance risks across development, deployment and post deployment stages. Although multiple AI risk assessment frameworks exist, they are often cross-sector, lengthy and difficult to operationalise in ways that support proportionate evidence generation and regulatory use. Methods: We conducted a targeted evidence synthesis and framework mapping exercise drawing on review-level evidence, scientific databases and regulatory sources. Three core review studies informed framework identification and mapping. Selected frameworks and guidance, including NIST AI RMF, the Fraunhofer IAIS AI Assessment Catalogue, ALTAI, the ICO AI and Data Protection Risk Toolkit, MHRA guidance, the NICE Evidence Standards Framework, SPIRIT-AI and CONSORT-AI, were mapped across lifecycle stages using a structured extraction matrix. Framework concepts were translated into healthcare-oriented worksheets and refined through structured engagement with healthcare AI innovators. Results: Frameworks varied substantially in scope, lifecycle coverage, terminology and implementation approach. Innovator feedback identified recurring themes including cognitive burden, usability, need for clearer intended purpose, lifecycle support, actionable examples and improved regulatory traceability. Participants highlighted challenges applying frameworks across diverse healthcare contexts and AI roles. Worksheet refinement introduced simplified domains, healthcare-specific context prompts, evidence and action fields and stage-aware guidance. Discussion: AI risk frameworks are necessary but not sufficient for healthcare innovation unless translated into practical tools. A codesigned worksheet approach can support proportionate evidence capture and iterative risk management while remaining adaptable across use cases and maturity levels.en_GB
dc.description.sponsorshipthe RADIANT Centre of Excellence in Regulatory Science and Innovation (CERSI), funded by UK Research and Innovation through the Medical Research Council (Grant No. MC-PC-24031), Innovate UK, the Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA) and the Office for Life Sciences (OLS)en_GB
dc.description.sponsorshipWellcome Trust, grant 300252/Z/23/Z-
dc.format.extentpp. 1–9-
dc.format.mediumPrint-Electronic-
dc.languageEnglishen_GB
dc.language.isoenen_GB
dc.publisherBMJ Publishing Groupen_GB
dc.rightsRe-use licence for this version: CC BY-
dc.rightsLicence for published version: Publisher's own licence-
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/-
dc.titleHealthcare AI risk management: an innovator-informed approach from frameworks to practical worksheets for proportionate regulatory evidence captureen_GB
dc.typeArticleen_GB
dc.date.dateAccepted2026-09-10-
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1136/bmjinnov-2026-001643-
dc.relation.isPartOfBMJ Innovationsen_GB
pubs.issue0-
pubs.publication-statusPublished online-
pubs.volume00-
dc.identifier.eissn2055-642X-
dc.rights.licensehttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode.en-
dcterms.dateAccepted2026-09-10-
dcterms.issued2026-09-24-
dc.date.updated2026-09-27T09:56:17Z-
dc.rights.holderAuthor(s) (or their employer(s))-
dc.contributor.orcidZebin, Tahmina [0000-0003-0437-0570]-
dc.contributor.orcidColecchia, Federico [0000-0001-7447-7117]-
dc.contributor.orcidShinhmar, Sonia [0009-0004-4403-6125]-
dc.contributor.orcidBondaronek, Paulina [0000-0003-0096-1234]-
dc.contributor.orcidPotts, Henry WW [0000-0002-6200-8804]-
dc.contributor.orcidTucker, Allan [0000-0001-5105-3506]-
dc.contributor.orcidSpinelli, Gabriella [0000-0003-1717-7868]-
Appears in Collections:Department of Computer Science Research Papers
Brunel Design School Research Papers

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
FullText.pdfCopyright © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2026. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ Group. This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to copy, redistribute, remix, transform and build upon this work for any purpose, provided the original work is properly cited, a link to the licence is given, and indication of whether changes were made. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.1.14 MBAdobe PDFView/Open


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons