Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/33942
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorTheis, Nicola-
dc.contributor.authorKilbride, Cherry-
dc.contributor.authorAshford, Stephen A-
dc.date.accessioned2026-10-05T07:45:57Z-
dc.date.available2026-10-05T07:45:57Z-
dc.date.issued2026-10-03-
dc.identifier.citationTheis, N., Kilbride, C. and Ashford, S.A. (2026) 'Ultrasound Use in Clinical Decision-Making for Spasticity and Contracture Management in Neurological Rehabilitation', Journal of Functional Morphology and Kinesiology, 11(4), 405, pp. 1–17. doi: 10.3390/jfmk11040405.en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/33942-
dc.descriptionData Availability Statement: No new data were created or analyzed in this study. Data sharing is not applicable to this article.en_US
dc.description.abstractUltrasound is increasingly used in neurological rehabilitation, most visibly to improve the accuracy and safety of botulinum toxin (BoNT) and phenol administration for spasticity. However, its potential to contribute to wider clinical decision-making remains underdeveloped, particularly through characterisation of structural muscle–tendon unit (MTU) changes that may help clinicians interpret the relative neural and structural contributors to stiffness and contracture. This position paper argues that ultrasound should be conceptualised not only as a procedural adjunct but also as a clinical decision-support tool. We synthesise current evidence supporting muscle ultrasound for tissue characterisation and intervention guidance, outline barriers to implementation, and distinguish established procedural applications from the emerging use of ultrasound for tissue-informed clinical decision support. The modified Heckmatt scale is presented as one feasible method for tissue characterisation within this broader ultrasound toolkit, while recognising that validated thresholds linking ultrasound findings to specific treatment decisions have not yet been established. Further methodological standardisation, competency development and prospective evaluation are required before these emerging applications can be incorporated consistently into routine clinical pathways.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipThis research received no external funding.en_US
dc.format.extentpp. 1–17-
dc.format.mediumElectronic-
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherMDPIen_US
dc.rightsRe-use licence for this version: CC BY-
dc.rightsLicence for published version: CC BY-
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/-
dc.subjectspasticityen_US
dc.subjectcontractureen_US
dc.subjectultrasounden_US
dc.titleUltrasound Use in Clinical Decision-Making for Spasticity and Contracture Management in Neurological Rehabilitationen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.date.dateAccepted2026-09-25-
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.3390/jfmk11040405-
dc.relation.isPartOfJournal of Functional Morphology and Kinesiologyen_US
pubs.publication-statusPublished online-
dc.identifier.eissn2411-5142-
dc.rights.licensehttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode.en-
dcterms.dateAccepted2026-09-25-
dcterms.dateAccepted2026-10-03-
dc.date.updated2026-09-29T08:45:02Z-
dc.rights.holderThe authors-
dc.contributor.orcidTheis, Nicola [0000-0002-0775-1355]-
dc.contributor.orcidKilbride, Cherry [0000-0002-2045-1883]-
dc.contributor.orcidAshford, Stephen A. [0000-0001-5541-7063]-
dc.identifier.number405-
Appears in Collections:Department of Health Sciences Research Papers

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
FullText.pdfCopyright: © 2026 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license.921.71 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons