Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/33953
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorHassan, Anushé-
dc.contributor.authorLawson, David W-
dc.contributor.authorSchaffnit, Susan B-
dc.contributor.authorUrassa, Mark-
dc.contributor.authorSear, Rebecca-
dc.date.accessioned2026-10-07T11:10:45Z-
dc.date.available2026-10-07T11:10:45Z-
dc.date.issued2026-08-01-
dc.identifier.citationHassan, A. et al. (2026) 'Childcare in Transition: Evidence That Patterns of Childcare Differ by Degree of Market Integration in Northwestern Tanzania', Demography, 63(4), pp. 1375–1396. doi: 10.1215/00703370-12795529.en_US
dc.identifier.issn0070-3370-
dc.identifier.urihttps://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/33953-
dc.descriptionReproducibility and Data Availability: The data analyzed in this study are not public because of ethical restrictions but are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.en_US
dc.description.abstractWomen have received help with child-rearing throughout human history, and much of this help would have come from kin. Market integration presumably reduces kin numbers in social networks, which may transform the patterns of support that mothers receive. Yet, few empirical studies have quantified the role of market integration in childcare arrangements. Using survey data from 808 under-5 children from Mwanza, Tanzania, we explore differences in childcare arrangements between a village that is less market-integrated and a town that is more market-integrated. We consider low-intensity and high-intensity childcare from fathers, siblings, maternal grandparents, paternal grandparents, maternal aunts/uncles, paternal aunts/uncles, and distant kin or nonkin. We generate data on, and investigate, an often assumed but rarely tested hypothesis: that market integration is associated with (1) lower odds of childcare support from kin and (2) higher odds of support from nonkin. We find mixed support: fathers, siblings, and paternal kin have lower odds, and distant kin/nonkin have higher odds, of providing care in the town than in the village. Maternal kin caregiving is not associated with place of residence. Our findings suggest that market integration disrupts paternal kin childcare arrangements but not care from maternal kin, who may overcome greater physical distances to maintain contact. Distant kin/nonkin appear to substitute for reduced support from close kin in the town.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipEconomic and Social Research Council (ESRC) UBEL Doctoral Training Partnership Studentshipen_US
dc.description.sponsorshipESRC Overseas Fieldwork Funding Grant-
dc.description.sponsorshipLondon School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine Research Degree Travelling Scholarship-
dc.description.sponsorshipEuropean Human Behaviour and Evolution Association Student Research Grant-
dc.description.sponsorshipBiosocial Society Small Research Grant-
dc.description.sponsorshipParkes Foundation Small Grant-
dc.description.sponsorshipRoyal Anthropological Institute Ruggles-Gates Fund for Biological Anthropology, grant numbers 61426 and 62773-
dc.description.sponsorshipUniversity of California System, grant number TRT-2022-30378-
dc.description.sponsorshipJohn Templeton Foundation, grant numbers 61426 and 62773-
dc.description.sponsorshipTempleton Religion Trust, grant number TRT-2022-30378-
dc.description.sponsorshipGovernment of the Netherlands through the TANESA Project-
dc.description.sponsorshipGlobal Fund, grant numbers TNZ-405-G04-H and TNZ-911-G14-S-
dc.format.extentpp. 1375–1396-
dc.format.mediumPrint-Electronic-
dc.languageEnglish-
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherDuke University Pressen_US
dc.rightsRe-use licence for this version: CC BY-NC-ND-
dc.rightsLicence for published version: CC BY-NC-ND-
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/-
dc.subjectallomaternal childcareen_US
dc.subjectkinshipen_US
dc.subjectmarket integrationen_US
dc.subjectsupport networksen_US
dc.subjectTanzaniaen_US
dc.subject.meshHumans-
dc.subject.meshSocioeconomic Factors-
dc.subject.meshChild, Preschool-
dc.subject.meshInfant-
dc.subject.meshChild Care-
dc.subject.meshTanzania-
dc.subject.meshFemale-
dc.subject.meshMale-
dc.subject.meshFamily Support-
dc.subject.meshHumans-
dc.subject.meshTanzania-
dc.subject.meshChild Care-
dc.subject.meshFemale-
dc.subject.meshChild, Preschool-
dc.subject.meshMale-
dc.subject.meshInfant-
dc.subject.meshFamily Support-
dc.subject.meshSocioeconomic Factors-
dc.subject.other1603 Demography-
dc.subject.otherDemography-
dc.titleChildcare in Transition: Evidence That Patterns of Childcare Differ by Degree of Market Integration in Northwestern Tanzaniaen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1215/00703370-12795529-
dc.relation.isPartOfDemography-
pubs.issue4-
pubs.publication-statusPublished-
pubs.volume63-
dc.identifier.eissn1533-7790-
dc.rights.licensehttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/legalcode.en-
dcterms.dateAccepted2026-07-01-
dcterms.descriptionHighlights: • This study uses novel data on multiple childcare types from both kin and nonkin in two culturally similar communities with varying market integration. • It tests the hypothesis that market integration is associated with reduced kin support. • Who provides support and the type of support vary by level of market integration. • Market integration disrupts childcare support from paternal but not maternal kin. • Distant kin and nonkin substitute for reduced support from close kin in the study's town.en_US
dcterms.issued2026-08-01-
dc.date.updated2026-10-07T11:04:32Z-
dc.rights.holderThe Authors-
dc.contributor.orcidHassan, Anushé [0000-0003-3649-3049]-
dc.contributor.orcidLawson, David W [0000-0002-1550-2615]-
dc.contributor.orcidSchaffnit, Susan B [0000-0001-7886-7614]-
dc.contributor.orcidUrassa, Mark [0000-0003-0257-6938]-
dc.contributor.orcidSear, Rebecca [0000-0002-4315-0223]-
Appears in Collections:Department of Life Sciences Research Papers

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
FullText.pdfCopyright © 2026 The Authors. Freely available online through the Demography open access option. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).863.07 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons