Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/34085
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorWillard, Aiyana-
dc.contributor.authorTurpin, Hugh-
dc.contributor.authorBaimel, Adam-
dc.date.accessioned2026-10-24T13:51:57Z-
dc.date.available2026-10-24T13:51:57Z-
dc.date.issued2023-02-23-
dc.identifier.citationWillard, A., Turpin, H. and Baimel, A. (2023) 'Universal Cognitive Biases as the Basis for Supernatural Beliefs: Evidence and Critiques', Oxford Handbook of Cultural Evolution. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 565–578. doi: 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198869252.013.46.en_US
dc.identifier.isbn9780198869252-
dc.identifier.isbn9780191905780-
dc.identifier.urihttps://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/34085-
dc.descriptionOxford University Press only permits up to 25% of an accepted manuscript to be archived in our institutional repository. Please contact the author if you require the whole manuscript or request an inter library loan of the chapter (see our How do I order an Interlibrary Loan? at https://libanswers.brunel.ac.uk/faq/13645).en_US
dc.description.abstractWhat explains the ubiquity of religions across time and space, and why do these supernatural belief systems seem to have so much in common? Many cognitive scientists of religion have proposed that cross-cultural patterns in religious belief are, at least in part, the indirect result of reliably developing and otherwise adaptive features of the human mind. These ‘cognitive bias’ theories propose that religion is a by-product of universal mental architecture. Similar beliefs recur in unrelated cultural and historical contexts because of biases in how we perceive and interpret the word, and how we remember concepts. This chapter reviews the evidence, merits, and limitations of such theories. In so doing, the chapter addresses the most influential of the cognitive bias theories: the proposed relationships between various religious beliefs and Theory of Mind, anthropomorphism, dualism, teleological reasoning, and minimally counterintuitive concepts. Both the strengths and shortcomings of these theories in explaining religious belief are addressed and the chapter suggests future directions.en_US
dc.format.extentpp. 565–578-
dc.format.mediumPrint-Electronic-
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherOxford University Pressen_US
dc.rightsRe-use licence for this version: InCopyright-
dc.rightsLicence for published version: Publisher's own licence-
dc.rights.urihttps://rightsstatements.org/page/InC/1.0/-
dc.subjectreligionen_US
dc.subjectcognitive biasesen_US
dc.subjectanthropomorphismen_US
dc.subjectmind–body dualismen_US
dc.subjectteleologyen_US
dc.subjectminimally counterintuitiveen_US
dc.titleUniversal Cognitive Biases as the Basis for Supernatural Beliefs: Evidence and Critiquesen_US
dc.typeBook chapteren_US
dc.relation.isPartOfOxford Handbook of Cultural Evolution-
pubs.publication-statusPublished-
dcterms.issued2023-02-23-
dc.date.updated2026-10-22T10:59:04Z-
dc.rights.holderThe Author(s)-
dc.contributor.orcidWillard, Aiyana K. [0000-0001-9224-7534]-
dc.contributor.orcidTurpin, Hugh [0000-0003-0741-5340]-
Appears in Collections:Department of Life Sciences Research Papers

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Extract.pdfCopyright © The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press This is a draft of a chapter that has been published by Oxford University Press in the book Oxford Handbook of Cultural Evolution edited by Jamshid J. Tehrani, Jeremy Kendal and Rachel L. Kendal, 2023, reproduced by permission of Oxford University Press, https://academic.oup.com/edited-volume/45648 (a contributor to a multi-author work or edited collection is permitted to share up to 25% of the Author’s Accepted Manuscript version of their total contribution to that work on their own or their institutional site or subject-based repository under the publisher's Author reuse and self-archiving policy at: https://academic.oup.com/pages/for-authors/books/the-book-publishing-process/publication-and-beyond/author-reuse-and-self-archiving#edited).132.73 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in BURA are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.