Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/3489
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorHughes, J-
dc.coverage.spatial23en
dc.date.accessioned2009-07-16T12:30:02Z-
dc.date.available2009-07-16T12:30:02Z-
dc.date.issued2005-
dc.identifier.citationWork, Employment and Society, 19(3): 603-625en
dc.identifier.urihttp://wes.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/19/3/603en
dc.identifier.urihttp://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/3489-
dc.description.abstractThis article centrally examines the sociological significance of emotional intelligence (EI) as a nascent managerial discourse. Through developing a three-way reading of the writers Richard Sennett, Daniel Goleman, and George Ritzer, it is contended that EI can be understood to signal ‘new rules’ for work involving demands for workers to develop moral character better attuned to the dynamics of the flexible workplace - character that is more ‘intelligent’, adaptive, and reflexive. Furthermore, it is argued that while EI appears in some important respects to open the scope for worker discretion, it might also signal diminished scope for worker resistance. However, ultimately, the case of EI is used to problematise recent discussions of worker resistance - to suggest the possibility of ‘resistant’ worker agency exercised through collusion with, as well as transgression of, corporate norms and practices.en
dc.format.extent361930 bytes-
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.language.isoen-
dc.publisherSageen
dc.subjectEmotional intelligenceen
dc.subjectMoral characteren
dc.subjectManagement controlen
dc.subjectResistanceen
dc.titleBringing emotion to work: Emotional intelligence, resistance, and the reinvention of characteren
dc.typeResearch Paperen
dc.identifier.doihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0950017005055675-
Appears in Collections:Sociology
Dept of Social and Political Sciences Research Papers



Items in BURA are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.