Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/3943
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorRohloff, A-
dc.coverage.spatial11en
dc.date.accessioned2009-12-09T12:04:44Z-
dc.date.available2009-12-09T12:04:44Z-
dc.date.issued2008-
dc.identifier.citationNew Zealand Sociology. 23(1): 66-76en
dc.identifier.issn0112-921X-
dc.identifier.urihttp://www.ipp.org.nz/essudocs/sociology/nzs234.pdfen
dc.identifier.urihttp://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/3943-
dc.description.abstractApplying the ideas of Norbert Elias to the sociology of moral panics, this article argues that moral panics are processes of decivilization; occurring where civilizing processes break down and decivilizing trends become dominant. Examining the definitions of Goode & Ben-Yehuda (1994) and Stanley Cohen (2002), the article compares key characteristics of moral panics with some of the symptoms of decivilizing processes as proposed by Stephen Mennell (1990). Proposing two different types of campaigns that may accompany panics – integrative campaigns to ‘civilize’ the ‘other’; and exclusionary campaigns to isolate the ‘dangerous’ other – the article concludes by outlining how some of the fundamental concepts of figurational sociology can aid in our understanding of the complexities of moral panics.en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherMassey Universityen
dc.titleMoral panics as decivilizing processes: Towards an Eliasian approachen
dc.typeResearch Paperen
Appears in Collections:Sociology
Dept of Social and Political Sciences Research Papers

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Fulltext.pdf93.7 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in BURA are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.