Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
|Title:||Do men’s faces really signal heritable immunocompetence?|
|Keywords:||Attractiveness;Competition;Faces;Female choice;Humans;Immunocompetence;Males;Masculinity;Mate preferences;Testosterone|
|Publisher:||International Society for Behavioral Ecology|
|Citation:||Behavioral Ecology, Online Paper, Nov 2012|
|Abstract:||In the literature on human mate choice, masculine facial morphology is often proposed to be an intersexual signal of heritable immunocompetence, and hence an important component of men’s attractiveness. This hypothesis has received considerable research attention, and is increasingly treated as plausible and well supported. In this article, we propose that the strength of the evidence for the immunocompetence hypothesis is somewhat overstated, and that a number of difficulties have been under-acknowledged. Such difficulties include (1) the tentative nature of the evidence regarding masculinity and disease in humans, (2) the complex and uncertain picture emerging from the animal literature on sexual ornaments and immunity, (3) the absence of consistent, cross-cultural support for the predictions of the immunocompetence hypothesis regarding preferences for masculinized stimuli, and (4) evidence that facial masculinity contributes very little, if anything, to overall attractiveness in real men. Furthermore, alternative explanations for patterns of preferences, in particular the proposal that masculinity is primarily an intrasexual signal, have been neglected. We suggest that immunocompetence perspectives on masculinity, whilst appealing in many ways, should still be regarded as speculative, and that other perspectives–and other traits–should be the subject of greater attention for researchers studying human mate preferences.|
|Description:||This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.5/uk/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. © The Authors 2012. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the International Society for Behavioral Ecology.|
This article has been made available through the Brunel Open Access Publishing Fund.
|Appears in Collections:||Brunel OA Publishing Fund|
Dept of Life Sciences Research Papers
Items in BURA are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.