Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/814| Title: | What do connectionnist simulations tell us? |
| Authors: | Gobet, F |
| Keywords: | connectionnism;Pdp;Acquisition of language;Computational modelling;Elman;Computational models of the acquisition of language;Rispoli;Cognitive development;Past tense acquisition;Piaget;Rohde;Plaut;Raijmakers;Balance beam task;Representational innateness;Epigenesis;Non-linear dynamics;Starting small;Rethinking innateness |
| Issue Date: | 1999 |
| Publisher: | Cambridge University Press |
| Citation: | Journal of Child Language, 26: 242-245 |
| Abstract: | In his review, Rispoli’s main concern is that Elman et al.’s book will aggravate the degree of polarisation in developmental psycholinguistics. I cannot really comment on this worry, as developmental psycholinguistics is not my field. Instead, I will discuss some questions more related to my background--the role of computational modelling in Elman et al.’s approach. |
| URI: | http://www.cambridge.org/uk/default.asp http://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/814 |
| Appears in Collections: | Psychology Dept of Life Sciences Research Papers |
Files in This Item:
| File | Description | Size | Format | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Connectionnist_simulations.pdf | 24.75 kB | Adobe PDF | View/Open |
Items in BURA are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.