Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/8288
Full metadata record
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Ndekugri, I | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2014-04-10T08:58:14Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2014-04-10T08:58:14Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2008 | - |
dc.identifier.citation | International Journal of Project Management, 26(8), 789 - 799, 2008 | en_US |
dc.identifier.issn | 0263-7863 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0263786307001469 | en |
dc.identifier.uri | http://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/8288 | - |
dc.description | This is the post-print version of the final paper published in International Journal of Project Management. The published article is available from the link below. Changes resulting from the publishing process, such as peer review, editing, corrections, structural formatting, and other quality control mechanisms may not be reflected in this document. Changes may have been made to this work since it was submitted for publication. Copyright @ 2007 Elsevier B.V. | en_US |
dc.description.abstract | Delays and disruption to contractors’ progress are a major source of claims and disputes in the construction industry. Often at the heart of the matter in dispute is the question of the extent of each contracting party’s responsibility for the project delay. Various delay analysis methodologies have been developed over the years as aids to answering this question. This paper reports on a study into the factors that influence analysts’ selection from these methodologies. Eighteen factors were identified through literature review and pilot surveys and then ranked on their relative importance based on data collected in a nation-wide survey of UK construction organisations. Factor analysis was used to reduce the factors into 6 group factors: project characteristics, contractual requirements, characteristics of baseline programme, cost proportionality, timing of the analysis and record availability. | en_US |
dc.language.iso | en | en_US |
dc.publisher | Elsevier | en_US |
dc.subject | Claims | en_US |
dc.subject | Delay and disruption | en_US |
dc.subject | Extension of time | en_US |
dc.subject | Programming | en_US |
dc.subject | Delay analysis | en_US |
dc.title | Factors influencing the selection of delay analysis methodologies | en_US |
dc.type | Article | en_US |
dc.identifier.doi | http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2007.09.001 | - |
pubs.organisational-data | /Brunel | - |
pubs.organisational-data | /Brunel/Brunel Active Staff | - |
pubs.organisational-data | /Brunel/Brunel Active Staff/School of Engineering & Design | - |
pubs.organisational-data | /Brunel/Brunel Active Staff/School of Engineering & Design/Mechanical Engineering | - |
Appears in Collections: | Civil Engineering Publications Dept of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering Research Papers |
Files in This Item:
File | Description | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Fulltext.pdf | 149.27 kB | Adobe PDF | View/Open |
Items in BURA are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.