Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
Title: You get what you (don’t) pay for: The impact of volunteer labour and candidate spending at the 2010 British general election
Authors: Fisher, J
Johnston, R
Cutts, D
Pattie, C
Fieldhouse, E
Keywords: Electoral payoffs;Constituency campaigning;British general elections 2010;Campaign techniques
Issue Date: 2014
Publisher: Oxford University Press
Citation: Parliamentary Affairs, 67(4): 804-824, (2014)
Abstract: Repeated evidence in Britain demonstrates the positive electoral payoffs from constituency campaigning. However, the impact of such campaigning varies depending upon the electoral context and the effectiveness of campaign management. Debate also exists in respect of the relative impact of traditional versus more modern campaign techniques, as well as between campaign techniques that incur cost and those that are carried out voluntarily. Such debates are of interest not only to academics and political parties, but also to regulators when considering whether to restrict campaign spending in the interests of electoral parity. This article uses candidate spending data and responses to an extensive survey of election agents at the British General Election of 2010 to assess the impact of both campaign expenditure and free, voluntary labour on electoral performance. It suggests that both have some independent impact, but that impact varies by party. The implications of these results are highly significant in both academic and regulatory terms—campaign expenditure can affect electoral outcomes but these effects are offset to some extent by voluntary efforts.
Description: The published version of this article is fully available from the publisher at the link below.
ISSN: 0031-2290
Appears in Collections:Dept of Politics, History and Law Research Papers

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
FullText.pdf68.15 kBAdobe PDFView/Open

Items in BURA are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.