Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/9814
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorKoshy, V-
dc.contributor.authorPinheiro-Torres, C-
dc.date.accessioned2015-01-19T16:48:49Z-
dc.date.available2015-01-19T16:48:49Z-
dc.date.issued2013-
dc.identifier.citationBritish Educational Research Journal, 39(6), 953-978, 2013en_US
dc.identifier.issn0141-1926-
dc.identifier.urihttp://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/berj.3021/abstract-
dc.identifier.urihttp://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/9814-
dc.descriptionThis is the accepted version of the following article: Koshy, V. and Pinheiro-Torres, C. (2013), ‘Are we being de-gifted, Miss?’ Primary school gifted and talented co-ordinators’ responses to the Gifted and Talented Education Policy in England. British Educational Research Journal, 39: 953–978. doi: 10.1002/berj.3021, which has been published in final form at http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/berj.3021/abstract.en_US
dc.description.abstractOver a decade ago the UK government launched its gifted and talented education policy in England, yet there has been very little published research which considers how schools and teachers are interpreting and implementing the policy. By seeking the views of the gifted and talented co-ordinators (For ease of reference, the term gifted and talented (G&T) co-ordinator is used throughout the paper as a generic shorthand for the research participants who were either designated school gifted and talented co-ordinators or teachers or head teachers with responsibility for policy implementation) with responsibility for addressing the requirements of the policy, the study reported in this paper explored how primary schools in England responded to the policy. Drawing on data gathered using questionnaires with a national sample of primary schools as well as follow-up in-depth interviews with a sample of G&T co-ordinators, the authors report their findings. The study found that there was considerable unease about the concept of identifying and ‘labelling’ a group of pupils as ‘gifted and talented’. G&T co-ordinators found it difficult to interpret the policy requirements and were responding pragmatically to what they considered to be required by the government. Curriculum provision for the selected group of gifted and talented pupils was patchy. The paper concludes by identifying a need for further professional development for teachers and by challenging the policy's over-emphasis on identifying and labelling gifted and talented pupils. We posit whether the gifted and talented education policy would have been better introduced and enjoyed greater success by leaving the identification of pupils to one side and by placing greater emphasis on developing effective learning and teaching strategies instead.en_US
dc.languageEn-
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherWileyen_US
dc.subjectGifted and talented educationen_US
dc.subjectEducation policyen_US
dc.subjectPrimary schoolsen_US
dc.subjectTeachersen_US
dc.title‘Are we being de-gifted, Miss?’ Primary school gifted and talented co-ordinators’ responses to the Gifted and Talented Education Policy in Englanden_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.doihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1002/berj.3021-
pubs.organisational-data/Brunel-
pubs.organisational-data/Brunel/Brunel Active Staff TxP-
pubs.organisational-data/Brunel/Brunel Active Staff TxP/College of Business, Arts and Social Sciences-
pubs.organisational-data/Brunel/Brunel Active Staff TxP/College of Business, Arts and Social Sciences/Dept of Education-
pubs.organisational-data/Brunel/Group Publication Pages-
pubs.organisational-data/Brunel/University Research Centres and Groups-
pubs.organisational-data/Brunel/University Research Centres and Groups/Brunel Business School - URCs and Groups-
pubs.organisational-data/Brunel/University Research Centres and Groups/Brunel Business School - URCs and Groups/Centre for Research into Entrepreneurship, International Business and Innovation in Emerging Markets-
pubs.organisational-data/Brunel/University Research Centres and Groups/School of Health Sciences and Social Care - URCs and Groups-
pubs.organisational-data/Brunel/University Research Centres and Groups/School of Health Sciences and Social Care - URCs and Groups/Brunel Institute for Ageing Studies-
pubs.organisational-data/Brunel/University Research Centres and Groups/School of Health Sciences and Social Care - URCs and Groups/Brunel Institute of Cancer Genetics and Pharmacogenomics-
pubs.organisational-data/Brunel/University Research Centres and Groups/School of Health Sciences and Social Care - URCs and Groups/Centre for Systems and Synthetic Biology-
pubs.organisational-data/Brunel/University Research Centres and Groups/School of Information Systems, Computing and Mathematics - URCs and Groups-
pubs.organisational-data/Brunel/University Research Centres and Groups/School of Information Systems, Computing and Mathematics - URCs and Groups/Multidisclipary Assessment of Technology Centre for Healthcare (MATCH)-
Appears in Collections:Dept of Education Research Papers

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Fulltext.pdf556.85 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in BURA are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.