Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/20979
Title: Ontologies relevant to behaviour change interventions: a method for their development
Authors: Wright, AJ
Norris, E
Finnerty, AN
Marques, MM
Johnston, M
Kelly, MP
Hastings, J
West, R
Michie, S
Keywords: Behaviour;Behaviour change;Ontologies;Interventions;Evidence synthesis;Evaluation studies
Issue Date: 10-Jun-2020
Publisher: F1000 Research Ltd
Citation: Wright AJ, Norris E, Finnerty AN et al. Ontologies relevant to behaviour change interventions: a method for their development. Wellcome Open Res 2020, 5:126
Abstract: Background: Behaviour and behaviour change are integral to many aspects of wellbeing and sustainability. However, reporting behaviour change interventions accurately and synthesising evidence about effective interventions is hindered by lacking a shared, scientific terminology to describe intervention characteristics. Ontologies are knowledge structures that provide controlled vocabularies to help unify and connect scientific fields. To date, there is no published guidance on the specific methods required to develop ontologies relevant to behaviour change. We report the creation and refinement of a method for developing ontologies that make up the Behaviour Change Intervention Ontology (BCIO). Aims: (1) To describe the development method of the BCIO and explain its rationale; (2) To provide guidance on implementing the activities within the development method. Method and results: The method for developing ontologies relevant to behaviour change interventions was constructed by considering principles of good practice in ontology development and identifying key activities required to follow those principles. The method’s details were refined through application to developing two ontologies. The resulting ontology development method involved: (1) defining the ontology’s scope; (2) identifying key entities; (3) refining the ontology through an iterative process of literature annotation, discussion and revision; (4) expert stakeholder review; (5) testing inter-rater reliability; (6) specifying relationships between entities, and; (7) disseminating and maintaining the ontology. Guidance is provided for conducting relevant activities for each step. Conclusions: We have developed a detailed method for creating ontologies relevant to behaviour change interventions, together with practical guidance for each step, reflecting principles of good practice in ontology development. The most novel aspects of the method are the use of formal mechanisms for literature annotation and expert stakeholder review to develop and improve the ontology content. We suggest the mnemonic SELAR3, representing the method’s first six steps as Scope, Entities, Literature Annotation, Review, Reliability, Relationships.
URI: http://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/20979
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.12688/wellcomeopenres.15908.1
ISSN: 2398-502X
Appears in Collections:Dept of Clinical Sciences Research Papers

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
FullText.pdf1.27 MBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in BURA are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.