Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/27983
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorToth, AJ-
dc.contributor.authorHarvey, C-
dc.contributor.authorGullane, H-
dc.contributor.authorKelly, N-
dc.contributor.authorBruton, A-
dc.contributor.authorCampbell, MJ-
dc.date.accessioned2024-01-08T15:47:03Z-
dc.date.available2024-01-08T15:47:03Z-
dc.date.issued2024-01-03-
dc.identifierORCiD: Adam Bruton https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7775-7499-
dc.identifier1275878-
dc.identifier.citationToth, A.J. et al. (2024) 'The effect of bipolar bihemispheric tDCS on executive function and working memory abilities', Frontiers in Psychology, 14, 1275878, pp. 1 - 9. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1275878.en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/27983-
dc.descriptionData availability statement: The raw data supporting the conclusions of this article will be made available by the authors, without undue reservation.en_US
dc.description.abstractIntroduction: Cognitive functioning is central to the ability to learn, problem solve, remember, and use information in a rapid and accurate manner and cognitive abilities are fundamental for communication, autonomy, and quality of life. Transcranial electric stimulation (tES) is a very promising tool shown to improve various motor and cognitive functions. When applied as a direct current stimulus (transcranial direct current stimulation; tDCS) over the dorsolateral pre-frontal cortex (DLPFC), this form of neurostimulation has mixed results regarding its ability to slow cognitive deterioration and potentially enhance cognitive functioning, requiring further investigation. This study set out to comprehensively investigate the effect that anodal and cathodal bipolar bihemispheric tDCS have on executive function and working memory abilities. Methods: 72 healthy young adults were recruited, and each participant was randomly allocated to either a control group (CON), a placebo group (SHAM) or one of two neurostimulation groups (Anodal; A-STIM and Cathodal; C-STIM). All participants undertook cognitive tests (Stroop & N Back) before and after a 30-minute stimulation/ sham/ control protocol. Results: Overall, our results add further evidence that tDCS may not be as efficacious for enhancing cognitive functioning as it has been shown to be for enhancing motor learning when applied over M1. We also provide evidence that the effect of neurostimulation on cognitive functioning may be moderated by sex, with males demonstrating a benefit from both anodal and cathodal stimulation when considering performance on simple attention trial types within the Stroop task. Discussion: Considering this finding, we propose a new avenue for tDCS research, that the potential that sex may moderate the efficacy of neurostimulation on cognitive functioning.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipThe author(s) declare that no financial support was received for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.en_US
dc.format.extent1 - 9-
dc.format.mediumElectronic-
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherFrontiers Mediaen_US
dc.rightsCopyright © 2024 Toth, Harvey, Gullane, Kelly, Bruton and Campbell. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.-
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/-
dc.subjecttranscranial direct cortical stimulation (tDCS)en_US
dc.subjectexecutive functionsen_US
dc.subjectworking memory (WM)en_US
dc.subjectleft dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC)en_US
dc.subjectneuromodulationen_US
dc.titleThe effect of bipolar bihemispheric tDCS on executive function and working memory abilitiesen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1275878-
dc.relation.isPartOfFrontiers in Psychology-
pubs.publication-statusPublished online-
pubs.volume14-
dc.identifier.eissn1664-1078-
dc.rights.licensehttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode.en-
dc.rights.holderToth, Harvey, Gullane, Kelly, Bruton and Campbell-
Appears in Collections:Dept of Life Sciences Research Papers

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
FullText.pdfCopyright © 2024 Toth, Harvey, Gullane, Kelly, Bruton and Campbell. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.467.06 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons