Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/29501
Title: The netball injury evidence base: a scoping review of methodologies and recommendations for future approaches.
Authors: Horne, S
Shaheen, AF
Baltzopoulos, B
Hills, L
Keywords: netball;injuries;scoping review;epidemiology;sport;Incidence;risk factors;mechanisms
Issue Date: 1-Aug-2024
Publisher: BioMed Central (BMC)
Citation: Horne, S. et al. (2024) 'The netball injury evidence base: a scoping review of methodologies and recommendations for future approaches.', Systematic Reviews, 13, 203, pp. 1 - 27. doi: 10.1186/s13643-024-02629-7.
Abstract: Background: Netball is a sport with a large participation base and a high risk of injuries. Effective injury prevention strategies are dependent upon a clear understanding of injury issues, aetiology and mechanisms, requiring robust research methodologies to ensure a reliable evidence base. This scoping review aims to identify the characteristics and range of netball injury research methodologies, to inform recommendations for future research. Methods: A systematic search of SPORTDiscus, MEDLINE, CINAHL and Academic Search Complete, PubMed, Scopus and Web of Science, from 1985 to May 2023 identified relevant studies. Inclusion criteria included peer-reviewed studies assessing injury incidence, aetiology and mechanisms in netball. Results: Following screening, 65 studies were included (68% descriptive epidemiology, 32% analytic epidemiology). Descriptive epidemiology reported data from hospital/clinic and insurance databases (57%) and netball competitions (43%). Only two studies used ongoing, systematic injury surveillance in netball cohorts, and significant heterogeneity existed in study designs, data collection methods, injury definitions and injury incidence rates calculations. Studies assessed a limited number of risk factors (descriptive competition studies: median: n = 4; analytic studies median: n = 6), with 76% using a simplistic reductionist approach to determine causality. Basic descriptions and retrospective recall of injury mechanisms reduced accuracy. Only two studies conducted comprehensive assessments of injury mechanisms using video-based methods. Conclusion: To establish an accurate netball injury evidence base, future research should prioritise the development of reliable, continuous surveillance systems. The International Olympic Committee (IOC) consensus statement guidelines are recommended for accurate injury data collection and reporting. A multifactorial approach should be adopted to assess the complex interaction between multiple risk factors, player load and the injury inciting event. Comprehensive descriptions of injury mechanisms using video methods, alongside descriptions from medical staff are recommended. This information is crucial for developing targeted prevention strategies.
Description: Availability of data and materials: All data generated or analysed during this study are included in this published article and its supplementary information files.
A preprint verson of this scoping review is available on Research Square at https://www.researchsquare.com/article/rs-3494995/v1. It has not been certified by peer review.
Supplementary materials is also available online at: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s13643-024-02629-7#Sec29 .
URI: https://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/29501
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-024-02629-7.
Other Identifiers: ORCiD: Sara Horne https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3852-4083
ORCiD: Aliah F Shaheen https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2492-8818
ORCiD: Bill Baltzopoulos https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2050-9501
ORCiD: Laura Hills https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3689-0386
203
Appears in Collections:Dept of Life Sciences Research Papers

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
FullText.pdfCopyright © The Author(s) 2024. Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.1.75 MBAdobe PDFView/Open


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons