Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/29781
Title: The effect of attentional cues on mechanical efficiency and movement smoothness in running gait: An interdisciplinary investigation
Authors: Moore, IS
Ashford, KJ
Mullen, R
Jones, HSR
McCarthy-Ryan, M
Keywords: focus of attention;gait retraining;conscious control;running gait;external work
Issue Date: 14-May-2024
Publisher: Routledge (Taylor & Francis Group)
Citation: Moore, I.S. et al. (2024) 'The effect of attentional cues on mechanical efficiency and movement smoothness in running gait: An interdisciplinary investigation', Journal of Sports Sciences, 42 (7), pp. 589 - 598. doi: 10.1080/02640414.2024.2353402.
Abstract: The aim was to examine the effect of focus of attention cues on foot angle for retraining movement purposes. Twenty (females: 8) rearfoot-striking recreational runners (mass: 72.5 ± 11.8 kg; height: 1.73 ± 0.09 m; age: 32.9 ± 11.3 years) were randomly assigned to an internal focus (IF) (n = 10) or external focus (EF) (n = 10) verbal cue group. Participants performed 5 × 6 minute blocks of treadmill running (control run, 3 × cued running, retention run) at a self-selected running velocity (9.4 ± 1.1 km∙h−1) during a single laboratory visit. Touchdown foot angle, mechanical efficiency, internal and external work were calculated and, centre of mass (COM) and foot movement smoothness was quantified. Linear-mixed effect models showed an interaction for foot angle (p < 0.001, ηp2 = 0.35) and mechanical efficiency (p < 0.001, ηp2 = 0.40) when comparing the control to the cued running. Only the IF group reduced foot angle and mechanical efficiency during cued running, but not during the retention run. The IF group produced less external work during the 1st cued run than the control run. COM and foot smoothness were unaffected by cueing. Only an IF produced desired technique changes but at the cost of reduced mechanical efficiency. Movement smoothness was unaffected by cue provision. Changes to foot angle can be achieved within 6 minutes of gait retraining.
Description: This article was originally published with errors, which have now been corrected in the online version. Please see Correction (https://doi.org/10.1080/02640414.2024.2365060 - In the initial version of the article, Figure 1a was published with some error. Now this have been corrected in this correction and also corrected in the original article.)
URI: https://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/29781
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02640414.2024.2353402
ISSN: 0264-0414
Other Identifiers: ORCiD: Isabel S Moore https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4746-3390
ORCiD: Richard Mullen https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7920-6233
Appears in Collections:Dept of Life Sciences Research Papers

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
FullText.pdfCopyright © 2024 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, and is not altered, transformed, or built upon in any way. The1.02 MBAdobe PDFView/Open


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons