Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/30063
Title: Exploring the Factors Preventing Older Adults From Reporting Cybercrime and Seeking Help: A Qualitative, Semistructured Interview Study
Authors: Havers, B
Tripathi, K
Burton, A
Martin, W
Cooper, C
Keywords: cybercrime;older;reporting;shame;digital ageism
Issue Date: 23-Oct-2024
Publisher: Wiley
Citation: Havers, B. et al. (2024) 'Exploring the Factors Preventing Older Adults From Reporting Cybercrime and Seeking Help: A Qualitative, Semistructured Interview Study', Health and Social Care in the Community, 0 (ahead of print), pp. 1 - 10. doi: 10.1155/2024/1314265.
Abstract: Background: Older adults under-report cybercrime, despite being more likely than younger people to experience repeat victimisation, financial loss and more severe emotional consequences. Considering vulnerabilities more common in old age, we sought to identify, and consider ways to address, barriers that older people experience when reporting cybercrime to statutory agencies with a role in reporting. Methods: From community groups, police and victim support, and health and social care organisations, we purposively invited people aged 60+ who had experienced cybercrime (n = 16), their supporting family members (n = 2) and professional stakeholders (n = 15) to participate in semistructured in-person or virtual interviews and conducted a reflexive thematic analysis. Results: Across 33 interviews, we identified four themes: (1) Shame and fear of repercussion; (2) Reporting unhelpful to emotional and financial recovery; (3) Lack of knowledge of scams and sources of support; and (4) Social support makes a difference. Conclusions: Digital ageism, evidenced by structural barriers, stigma and disempowerment experienced by older adults deciding whether to report cybercrime, warrants attention from the FJN and authorities. Independent “advocates” such as health, social care and third sector professionals can support older victims of cybercrime to navigate such reporting challenges.
Description: Data Availability Statement: Research data are not shared.
Supporting Information is available online at: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1155/2024/1314265#support-information-section - Appendices 1-3 are topic guides used by the authors to guide and structure participant interviews. There is a tailored topic guide for each participant category. Appendix 1 is the topic guide for interviews with older adults who have been victims of cybercrime. Appendix 2 is the topic guide for interviews with professional stakeholders. Appendix 3 is the topic guide for interviewing friends and family..
URI: https://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/30063
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1155/2024/1314265
ISSN: 0966-0410
Other Identifiers: ORCiD: Benjamin Havers https://orcid.org/0009-0004-2492-8142
ORCiD: Kartikeya Tripathi https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7215-6950
ORCiD: Alexandra Burton https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4433-3902
ORCiD: Wendy Martin https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5060-2382
ORCiD: Claudia Cooper https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2777-7616
Appears in Collections:Dept of Health Sciences Research Papers

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
FullText.pdfCopyright © 2024 Benjamin Havers et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.407.36 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons