Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/30407
Title: | A Data‐Driven Examination of Apathy and Depression in Cognitively Normal Older Adults |
Authors: | Da Silva, MV Aarsland, D Ballard, CG Corbett, A Ismail, Z Creese, B |
Issue Date: | 3-Jan-2025 |
Publisher: | Wiley on behalf of Alzheimer's Association |
Citation: | Da Silva, M.V. et al. (2024) A Data-Driven Examination of Apathy and Depression in Cognitively Normal Older Adults. [Poster] Exhibited at AAIC 2024, Philadelphia, PA, USA, 27 July-1 August, Alzheimer's and Dementia, 20 (S3 Supplement: Clinical Manifestations), e092258 (2). doi: 10.1002/alz.092258. |
Abstract: | Background: Apathy and mood symptoms are increasingly recognised as clinical important aspects of prodromal dementia; both are associated with increased risk of dementia even in cognitively normal people. The clinical overlap between apathy and low mood poses a challenge in distinguishing between the two conditions. It is crucial to differentiate between depression and apathy, along with any underlying syndromes, to facilitate the development of targeted treatments. Using a data-driven approach, we recently reported the existence of distinct apathy and depression clusters in dementia, confirming observations from the clinic and epidemiology. In this study we sought to establish whether similar patterns of symptoms were present in cognitively normal older adults Method: We analysed data from 21,925 community dwelling older adults. Latent class analysis (LCA) was applied to self-reported and proxy ratings (obtained using the Mild Behavioral Impairment Checklist) of apathy and mood. Polygenic Risk Scores for Alzheimer’s disease (AD) and Major Depression (MDD) were tested for associated with class membership. Result: The LCA analysis using proxy data showed a 4-class group which was considered the best model: No symptoms, Depression, Apathy/depression, and an Apathy group. The LCA using self-reported data reveals the 4-class group without a as a clear apathy class as the proxy data (see Figures 1 and 2). PRS for AD and MDD were only associated with depression and apathy/depression classes in self-reported data (not in proxy data). Conclusion: This analysis highlights the apathy phenotype as a unique and separate condition, underscoring the imperative for additional research in this area. This emphasizes the potential for innovative approaches to delve deeper into the exploration and comprehension of apathy. The differences between the self and proxy reported data highlights the possibility of under reporting of apathy by patients. |
URI: | https://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/30407 |
DOI: | https://doi.org/10.1002/alz.092258 |
ISSN: | 1552-5260 |
Other Identifiers: | ORCiD: Byron Creese https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6490-6037 e092258 |
Appears in Collections: | Dept of Life Sciences Research Papers |
Files in This Item:
File | Description | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|---|
FullText.pdf | Copyright © 2024 The Alzheimer's Association. Alzheimer's & Dementia published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of Alzheimer's Association. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. | 392.31 kB | Adobe PDF | View/Open |
This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License