Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/30591
Title: Students’ perception of authentic assessment in higher education: Exploring the relationship between assessment preference and motivation in higher education
Authors: Baines, S
Chauhan, S
Otermans, PCJ
Keywords: assessments;authentic assessment;intrinsic motivation;extrinsic motivation;amotivation;higher education
Issue Date: 17-Dec-2024
Publisher: Taylor & Francis
Citation: Baines, S., Chauhan, S. and Otermans, P.C.J. (2025) 'Students’ perception of authentic assessment in higher education: Exploring the relationship between assessment preference and motivation in higher education', Cogent Education, 12 (1), 2441067, pp. 1 - 12. doi: 10.1080/2331186X.2024.2441067.
Abstract: There is an increasing shift from traditional knowledge-testing exams to more effective learning-oriented assessments in Higher Education. There is limited evidence examining students’ perception of the authenticity of different Higher Education assessments predicted by intrinsic, extrinsic, and amotivation levels. Ninety-six young adults (19-49 years; 68 females) completed an online survey to investigate the role of motivation in preference ratings for 25 different assessments. Results showed that students only had a slight preference for certain assessments. In more detail, they had a significantly higher preference for poster submission predicted via intrinsic motivation, poster presentation predicted via intrinsic (to know) and extrinsic (introjected) motivation, multiple choice question exam (within a set framework), predicted via extrinsic (identified and introjected) motivation and amotivation, essay exam predicted via amotivation, and lab report predicted via extrinsic (introjected) motivation and amotivation. Therefore, alongside the facilitation of knowledge and understanding, assessments in Higher Education should be designed to foster interest and passion to conceptual learn and enjoy the content.
Description: Educational Assessment & Evaluation
URI: https://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/30591
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2024.2441067
Other Identifiers: ORCiD: Stephanie Baines https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7293-9517
ORCiD: Satyam Chauhan https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6605-3370
ORCiD: Pauldy C.J. Otermans https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8495-348X
2441067
Appears in Collections:Dept of Life Sciences Research Papers

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
FullText.pdfCopyright © 2024 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. The terms on which this article has been published allow the posting of the Accepted Manuscript in a repository by the author(s) or with their consent. COGENT EDUCATION 2025, VOL. 12, NO. 1, 2441067 https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2024.24410671.63 MBAdobe PDFView/Open


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons