Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/30903
Title: Low Concentrating Photovoltaic Geometry for Retrofitting Onto European Building Stock
Authors: Parupudi, RV
Redpath, D
Singh, H
Jalali, MR
Kolokotroni, M
Keywords: asymmetric compound parabolic concentrating (ACPC);compound parabolic concentrating (CPC);v-trough and buildings;clean energy;collector;optics;parabolic trough;photovoltaics;radiation;renewable;solar;solar reactor
Issue Date: 7-Aug-2024
Publisher: The American Society of Mechanical Engineers
Citation: Parupudi, R.V. et al. (2025) 'Low Concentrating Photovoltaic Geometry for Retrofitting Onto European Building Stock', Journal of Solar Energy Engineering, 147 (1), 011007, pp. 1 - 8. doi: 10.1115/1.4065980.
Abstract: The most appropriate low concentrating photovoltaic (LCPV) technology suitable for European buildings located in mid-high latitudes under both maritime and continental climatic conditions has been identified as the asymmetric compound parabolic concentrator (ACPC). To date, there is no published experimental data at different latitudes on the long-term performance of these systems at these latitudes nor how location would modify the optical characteristics of deployed systems. Previous theoretical research by the authors has demonstrated the superiority of the ACPC with this additional work experimentally confirming the robustness of the design. To investigate how seasonal and locational variations affect their measured technical performance two identical ACPC-LCPVs were installed, instrumented, and monitored at two different climatic locations (Uxbridge, UK, and Vevey, Switzerland) from May 2020 to September 2020. A valid comparative performance investigation characterizing two geometrically equivalent ACPC-based LCPV systems using real-life experimental data collected is presented in this paper. Locations at higher latitudes experience greater transverse angles more frequently compared to locations nearer the equator making ACPC geometries more appropriate than symmetrical concentrator configurations for building retrofit. This is shown in this paper over a latitudinal expanse of 31.35 deg for four separate locations; Tessalit (20.19 deg N, 1.00 deg E; Mali), Timimoun (28.03 deg N, 1.65 deg E; Algeria), Uxbridge (51.54 deg N, 0.48 deg E, UK), and Vevey (46.6 deg N, 6.84 deg E, Switzerland).
URI: https://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/30903
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4065980
ISSN: 0199-6231
Other Identifiers: ORCiD: Harjit Singh https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3448-1175
ORCiD: Mohammad Reza Jalali https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8708-3811
ORCiD: Maria Kolokotroni https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4478-1868
Article no. 011007
Appears in Collections:Dept of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering Research Papers

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
FullText.pdfCopyright © 2024 by ASME. This document is made available in line with publisher policy and may differ from the published version. Please cite the published version where possible. Copyright and all moral rights to the version of the paper presented here belong to the individual author(s) and/or other copyright owners unless otherwise stated.; reuse license: Attribution 4.0 International (CC-BY) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (see: https://www.asme.org/publications-submissions/journals/information-for-authors/open-access).800.62 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons