Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/30903
Title: | Low Concentrating Photovoltaic Geometry for Retrofitting Onto European Building Stock |
Authors: | Parupudi, RV Redpath, D Singh, H Jalali, MR Kolokotroni, M |
Keywords: | asymmetric compound parabolic concentrating (ACPC);compound parabolic concentrating (CPC);v-trough and buildings;clean energy;collector;optics;parabolic trough;photovoltaics;radiation;renewable;solar;solar reactor |
Issue Date: | 7-Aug-2024 |
Publisher: | The American Society of Mechanical Engineers |
Citation: | Parupudi, R.V. et al. (2025) 'Low Concentrating Photovoltaic Geometry for Retrofitting Onto European Building Stock', Journal of Solar Energy Engineering, 147 (1), 011007, pp. 1 - 8. doi: 10.1115/1.4065980. |
Abstract: | The most appropriate low concentrating photovoltaic (LCPV) technology suitable for European buildings located in mid-high latitudes under both maritime and continental climatic conditions has been identified as the asymmetric compound parabolic concentrator (ACPC). To date, there is no published experimental data at different latitudes on the long-term performance of these systems at these latitudes nor how location would modify the optical characteristics of deployed systems. Previous theoretical research by the authors has demonstrated the superiority of the ACPC with this additional work experimentally confirming the robustness of the design. To investigate how seasonal and locational variations affect their measured technical performance two identical ACPC-LCPVs were installed, instrumented, and monitored at two different climatic locations (Uxbridge, UK, and Vevey, Switzerland) from May 2020 to September 2020. A valid comparative performance investigation characterizing two geometrically equivalent ACPC-based LCPV systems using real-life experimental data collected is presented in this paper. Locations at higher latitudes experience greater transverse angles more frequently compared to locations nearer the equator making ACPC geometries more appropriate than symmetrical concentrator configurations for building retrofit. This is shown in this paper over a latitudinal expanse of 31.35 deg for four separate locations; Tessalit (20.19 deg N, 1.00 deg E; Mali), Timimoun (28.03 deg N, 1.65 deg E; Algeria), Uxbridge (51.54 deg N, 0.48 deg E, UK), and Vevey (46.6 deg N, 6.84 deg E, Switzerland). |
URI: | https://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/30903 |
DOI: | https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4065980 |
ISSN: | 0199-6231 |
Other Identifiers: | ORCiD: Harjit Singh https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3448-1175 ORCiD: Mohammad Reza Jalali https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8708-3811 ORCiD: Maria Kolokotroni https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4478-1868 Article no. 011007 |
Appears in Collections: | Dept of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering Research Papers |
Files in This Item:
File | Description | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|---|
FullText.pdf | Copyright © 2024 by ASME. This document is made available in line with publisher policy and may differ from the published version. Please cite the published version where possible. Copyright and all moral rights to the version of the paper presented here belong to the individual author(s) and/or other copyright owners unless otherwise stated.; reuse license: Attribution 4.0 International (CC-BY) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (see: https://www.asme.org/publications-submissions/journals/information-for-authors/open-access). | 800.62 kB | Adobe PDF | View/Open |
This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License