Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/31065
Title: | Lifestage differences in young UK women's reasons for research participation |
Authors: | Howcutt, SJ Barbosa-Bouças, S Brett, J Barnett, AL Smith, LA |
Keywords: | women;social marketing;health behaviour;prevention |
Issue Date: | 9-May-2020 |
Publisher: | Oxford University Press |
Citation: | Howcutt, S.J. et al. (2021) 'Lifestage differences in young UK women's reasons for research participation', Health Promotion International, 36 (1), pp. 132 - 142. doi: 10.1093/heapro/daaa041. |
Abstract: | Lifecourse epidemiology suggests that preconception is a valuable opportunity for health promotion with young women. Yet young women are less likely than older women to be research participants, limiting evidence about their needs and risks. Marketing data indicate that young adults are not engaged with one advertising strategy because they transition through three life stages: (i) limited independence and focus on own interests, (ii) increased independence and time with peers and (iii) establishing a home and family. The aim of this study was to explore whether these marketing lifestage categories could inform the tailoring of strategies to recruit young women. Three focus groups per lifestage category were conducted (49 women aged 16–34 years). Lifestage category (i) was represented by further education students, category (ii) by women in workplaces and (iii) by mothers. Questions explored participants’ lifestyles, identity, reasons for participation in the current study and beliefs about researchers. Three major themes were identified through framework analysis: profiling how young women spend their time; facilitators of participating in research and barriers to participating. Students and women in work valued monetary remuneration whereas mothers preferred social opportunities. Participants’ perceived identity influenced whether they felt useful to research. All groups expressed anxiety about participation. Altruism was limited to helping people known to participants. Therefore, the marketing categories did not map exactly to differences in young women’s motivations to participate but have highlighted how one recruitment strategy may not engage all. Mass media communication could, instead, increase familiarity and reduce anxiety about participation. |
URI: | https://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/31065 |
DOI: | https://doi.org/10.1093/heapro/daaa041 |
ISSN: | 0957-4824 |
Other Identifiers: | ORCiD: Sarah J. Howcutt https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4844-1732 ORCiD: Sofia Barbosa-Bouças https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8155-2867 |
Appears in Collections: | Dept of Life Sciences Research Papers |
Files in This Item:
File | Description | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|---|
FullText.pdf | Copyright © 2020 Oxford University Press. This is a pre-copy-editing, author-produced version of an article accepted for publication in Health Promotion International, following peer review. The definitive publisher-authenticated version Howcutt, S.J. et al. (2021) 'Lifestage differences in young UK women's reasons for research participation', Health Promotion International, 36 (1), pp. 132 - 142, is available online at: https://doi.org/10.1093/heapro/daaa041 (see: https://global.oup.com/academic/rights/permissions/autperm/?cc=gb&lang=en&). | 269.46 kB | Adobe PDF | View/Open |
Items in BURA are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.