Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/32202
Title: Acceptability of a digital pulmonary rehabilitation app as an adjunct or alternative to usual care for people with chronic lung diseases: A qualitative study of patients’ views and experiences
Authors: Knight-Davidson, P
Meshe, OF
Jenkins, TO
Edwards, GD
Patel, S
Moore, C
Hayden, K
Ball, G
Ingram, KA
Nolan, CM
Man, WDC
Keywords: COPD;hybrid pulmonary rehabilitation;hybrid pulmonary rehabilitation;digital skills;user acceptability
Issue Date: 13-Aug-2025
Publisher: SAGE Publications
Citation: Knight-Davidson, P. et al. (2025) 'Acceptability of a digital pulmonary rehabilitation app as an adjunct or alternative to usual care for people with chronic lung diseases: A qualitative study of patients’ views and experiences', Chronic Respiratory Disease, 22, pp. 1 - 9. doi: 10.1177/14799731251365632.
Abstract: Background: Centre-PR may not be accessible for people living distant from PR centres. Remote digital PR may have equivalent benefits to centre-PR; however, previous trials were potentially biased towards digitally literate patients, and largely excluded participants with a preference for centre-PR. There is limited data on the real-world implementation of, and acceptability for, Digital-PR alone or as an adjunct to other models of PR. Objectives: To gather patients’ views about the acceptability of Active+me REMOTE, a digital pulmonary rehabilitation app (Digital-PR). Methods: A qualitative exploratory study using semi-structured interviews with a subset (n = 15) of patients in a mixed method, feasibility study of a hybrid pulmonary rehabilitation, blending Digital-PR with other models of PR. Transcribed data were coded descriptively using Braun and Clarkes’ methodology, data interpretation was facilitated through a Miro virtual whiteboard. Results: There was appreciation for the concept of Digital-PR, indicated by positive responses in the domains of “friends and family recommendation,” “intention to continue using the app,” and “privacy concerns.” Benefits were reported by two participants who had declined centre-based PR. The app was rated low regarding user-friendliness. Challenges in understanding/using the app and a perception of challenges for others were reported and were associated with poor digital literacy and tech savviness. High digital skills did not predict a favourable assessment of the app as user-friendly. Discussion: Whilst there was a general appreciation for the concept of digital PR as an adjunct or alternative to traditional centre-based PR, the app did not appear to be user-friendly, nor acceptable to people with low digital literacy. The findings have implications for the wider routine implementation of Digital-PR.
Description: Supplementary Material is available online at: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/14799731251365632#supplementary-materials .
URI: https://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/32202
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/14799731251365632
ISSN: 1479-9723
Other Identifiers: ORCiD: Pamela Knight-Davidson https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0855-2574
ORCiD: Timothy O. Jenkins https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8631-0725
ORCiD: Claire M. Nolan https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9067-599X
Appears in Collections:Dept of Health Sciences Research Papers

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
FullText.pdfRights and permissions: Copyright © The Author(s) 2025. Creative Commons License (CC BY-NC 4.0). This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).813.48 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons