Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/32724| Title: | Mixed-methods study exploring medium to longer-term outcomes following selective dorsal rhizotomy in ambulatory children with cerebral palsy at a tertiary hospital in the UK: MOSAiC study protocol |
| Authors: | Chugh, D Kilbride, C Gimeno, H Aquilina, K Alderson, L Theologis, T Main, E |
| Issue Date: | 8-Dec-2025 |
| Publisher: | BMJ Publishing Group |
| Citation: | Chugh, D. et al. (2025) 'Mixed-methods study exploring medium to longer-term outcomes following selective dorsal rhizotomy in ambulatory children with cerebral palsy at a tertiary hospital in the UK: MOSAiC study protocol', BMJ Open, 15 (12), e108558, pp. 1 - 10. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2025-108558. |
| Abstract: | Introduction: Selective dorsal rhizotomy (SDR) is one of the treatment options available for spasticity management in ambulatory children and young people with cerebral palsy (CYPwCP). Although improvements in gross motor function one to two years after surgery have been established, evidence of longer-term benefit requires further investigation. Given the irreversible nature of SDR and the increased rehabilitation commitments required from families and clinicians, providing evidence of longer-term benefits is essential to support their decision-making. This study aims to investigate medium (3–5 years) and long-term (6–10 years) SDR outcomes in ambulatory children with CP and how SDR affects families’ lives over time. Methods and analysis: This is a convergent parallel mixed-methods study using the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health as a theoretical framework. The study aims to recruit 90 CYPwCP participants, who had SDR at a tertiary hospital in the UK when aged between 3 and 14 years. Participants (parents and CYPwCP) will be invited to complete an online survey and attend the hospital for one follow-up visit 3 or more years after SDR. Comparisons will be made with existing data on objective measures and parent-reported outcomes collected in clinical practice at baseline, 6, 12 and 24 months to understand the trajectory of changes. Semistructured interviews will be conducted with 18–20 parents/carers and 25–30 CYPwCP to understand their perspectives on the outcomes of SDR compared with their prior expectations. The Framework Method will be used to analyse qualitative data both inductively and deductively. Qualitative and quantitative study data will be integrated using joint displays. Ethics and dissemination: Ethical approval has been obtained through the Coventry and Warwick Research and Ethics Committee (24/WM/0078). Findings will be shared through international conferences, peer-reviewed journals, social media and dissemination events for families and CYP. Trial registration number: NCT06518889. |
| Description: | Supplemental material is available online at https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/bmjopen/15/12/e108558/DC1/embed/inline-supplementary-material-1.pdf?download=true and https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/bmjopen/15/12/e108558/DC2/embed/inline-supplementary-material-2.pdf?download=true . |
| URI: | https://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/32724 |
| DOI: | https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-108558 |
| Other Identifiers: | ORCiD: Deepti Chugh https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1002-0334
ORCiD: Cherry Kilbride https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2045-1883
ORCiD: Eleanor Main https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9739-3167 Article number: e108558 |
| Appears in Collections: | Dept of Health Sciences Research Papers |
Files in This Item:
| File | Description | Size | Format | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FullText.pdf | Copyright information © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2025. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ Group. This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to copy, redistribute, remix, transform and build upon this work for any purpose, provided the original work is properly cited, a link to the licence is given, and indication of whether changes were made. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. | 2.95 MB | Adobe PDF | View/Open |
This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License