Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/32792
Title: Randomised-controlled feasibility study evaluating the REgulate your SItting Time (RESIT) intervention for reducing sitting in individuals with type 2 diabetes: a process evaluation
Authors: Biddle, SJH
Brierley, ML
Castle, E
Hunt, ER
Chater, A
Edwardson, C
Bailey, D
Issue Date: 16-Feb-2026
Publisher: BMJ Publishing Group
Citation: Biddle, S.J.H. et al. (2026) 'Randomised-controlled feasibility study evaluating the REgulate your SItting Time (RESIT) intervention for reducing sitting in individuals with type 2 diabetes: a process evaluation', BMJ Open, 16, e101309, pp. 1–13. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2025-101309.
Abstract: Objectives: The REgulate your SItting Time (RESIT) is a tailored intervention targeting reductions and breaks in sitting in adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). A feasibility trial of RESIT had been conducted and the purpose of this paper is to report findings from the process evaluation. Design: A mixed-methods process evaluation within a randomised controlled feasibility trial. Setting: The study was conducted remotely in the community. Participants: Ambulatory individuals with T2DM aged 18–85 years. Intervention: A tailored intervention comprising an online education session, regular health coaching and technology for self-monitoring behaviour and prompting breaks in sitting. Primary and secondary outcome measures: Questionnaires (intervention participants n=22 at both 3 and 6 months; control participants n=21 at 3 months, n=29 at 6 months) and interviews (n=30, with n=13 intervention participants, n=12 control participants, n=5 health coaches) to assess perceptions of the intervention components, strategies and barriers for sitting less, the role of the study evaluation measures, and reasons for taking part. Results: The trial operated a largely successful online education element for those in the intervention group (82% completion; ≥76% engagement in individual educational elements). There was good use of self-monitoring and prompt technology (apps and wearables) with 73% of participants reporting using these at 6 months. Health coaching had high engagement and was perceived as enjoyable and useful. Data revealed strategies used for behaviour change (eg, active functional tasks) alongside barriers to change (eg, restrictions at work). There were also potential behavioural influences from the study evaluation measures (eg, activity measures increasing awareness and execution of behaviours) for both intervention and control participants. Conclusions: A comprehensive process evaluation identified successful intervention elements (ie, online education, health coaching, wearables and smartphone apps) alongside strategies and barriers to behaviour change. These findings can inform future sedentary behaviour interventions for adults with T2DM and a definitive randomised controlled trial evaluating RESIT. Trial registration number: ISRCTN14832389.
Description: Data availability statement: Data are available in a public, open access repository. The datasets supporting the conclusions of this article are available in Figshare, 10.17633/rd.brunel.25144490. The raw qualitative data (transcripts) are not publicly available due to privacy restrictions. Further details on the qualitative data and analysis that supports the findings of this study are available upon request to the corresponding author.
Strengths and Limitations of This Study: ⇒ A comprehensive mixed- methods process evaluation was conducted that has strengthened the learnings from this feasibility trial. ⇒ Qualitative and quantitative data were integrated to provide an in- depth understanding of factors affecting trial and intervention implementation. ⇒ The quantitative data analysis was limited to the participants who responded to the process evaluation questionnaires, which could influence the findings.
URI: https://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/32792
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-101309
Other Identifiers: ORCiD: Marsha L. Brierley https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6806-6052
ORCiD: Ellen M Castle https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6961-6108
ORCiD: Emily R. Hunt https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3454-7453
ORCiD: Daniel P. Bailey https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3772-630X
Appears in Collections:Department of Life Sciences Research Papers

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
FullText.pdfCopyright information: © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2026. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ Group. This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to copy, redistribute, remix, transform and build upon this work for any purpose, provided the original work is properly cited, a link to the licence is given, and indication of whether changes were made. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.592.26 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons