Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/33089
Title: Clinical impact of customised positive airway pressure (PAP) therapy interfaces (3DPiPPIn): a single site randomised controlled trial
Authors: Mansell, SK
Mandal, S
Gowing, F
Ridout, D
Kilbride, C
Olsen, O
Hilton, S
Main, E
Schievano, S
Issue Date: 27-Jan-2026
Publisher: BMJ Publishing Group
Citation: Mansell, S.K. et al. (2026) 'Clinical impact of customised positive airway pressure (PAP) therapy interfaces (3DPiPPIn): a single site randomised controlled trial', Thorax, 0 (ahead of print), pp. 1–7. doi: 10.1136/thorax-2025-224135.
Abstract: Introduction: Positive airway pressure (PAP) therapy is the recognised treatment for sleep disordered breathing (SDB), delivered via a tight-fitting face mask (interface). Conventional interfaces do not consider facial geometries, often resulting in poor fit and ineffective therapy. Three-dimensional (3D) printing of customised interfaces may improve comfort and outcomes. Objectives: To evaluate the clinical impact of customised versus conventional oronasal interfaces in adults with obstrcutive sleep apnoea (OSA). The primary outcome was residual Apnoea Hypopnea Index (AHI) at 6 months; secondary outcomes included interface leak, therapy concordance and patient reported symptoms. Methods: A randomised controlled trial with 160 adults naïve to PAP therapy and diagnosed with SDB (AHI ≥15 events/hour). Randomisation was minimised by age and ethnicity. Structured light facial scans (POP2, Revopoint, China) were used to produce 3D printed moulds (Fuse 30+, Formlabs, Massachusetts, USA) for silicone injected oronasal customised interface cushions. AHI was compared using quantile regression to account for the skewed distribution of the AHI data. Secondary outcomes were compared using logistic, quantile and linear regressions. Results: 160 participants were recruited (intervention: 82, control: 78). Customised interfaces were associated with a 1.5 (events/hour) increase in AHI (p=0.059), higher interface leak (difference in medians 30.0 L/min, 95% CI 7.36 to 40.14, p<0.0001) and lower compliance (difference in compliance 0.78, 95% CI 0.05 to 1.54, p=0.04) at 6 months. Conclusions: This trial did not demonstrate customised oronasal interfaces were superior to conventional interfaces. Future research should focus on addressing design and manufacturing limitations before any potential advantages can be evaluated. Trial registration number: ISRCTN74082423.
Description: Data availability statement: No data are available. Data supporting this study cannot be made available due to ethical, legal and commercial reasons.
URI: https://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/33089
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/thorax-2025-224135
ISSN: 0040-6376
Other Identifiers: ORCiD: Stephanie K. Mansell https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2806-380X
ORCiD: Swapna Mandal https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2232-5880
ORCiD: Deborah Ridout https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1336-6450
ORCiD: Cherry Kilbride https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2045-1883
ORCiD: Stephen Hilton https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8782-4499
ORCiD: Eleanor Main https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9739-3167
Appears in Collections:Department of Health Sciences Research Papers

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
FullText.pdfCopyright © 2026 The Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2026..This article has been accepted for publication in Thorax, published Online First: 27 January 2026, following peer review, and the Version of Record can be accessed online at https://doi.org/10.1136/thorax-2025-224135 (see: https://www.bmj.com/company/wp-content/uploads/2018/09/Non-Open-Access-Articles-September-2018.pdf). For the purpose of open access, the author has applied a ‘Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) licence to any Author Accepted Manuscript version arising.558.27 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons