Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/33207
Title: Development and Cross‐Sectional Validation of the Quality of Life and Function Five‐Domain Scale (QFS‐5) in Dementia‐Free Community‐Dwelling Older Adults
Authors: Ismail, Z
Warring, I
Guan, DX
Chue, P
Bardell, A
Ballard, C
Creese, B
Corbett, A
Pickering, E
Roach, P
Smith, EE
Keywords: EQ-5D;function;older adults;QFS-5;quality of life (QoL);validation
Issue Date: 23-Apr-2026
Publisher: Wiley
Citation: Ismail, Z. et al. (2026) 'Development and Cross‐Sectional Validation of the Quality of Life and Function Five‐Domain Scale (QFS‐5) in Dementia‐Free Community‐Dwelling Older Adults', International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, 41 (4), e70215, pp. 1–11. doi: 10.1002/gps.70215
Abstract: Introduction: Quality of life (QoL) captures objective life conditions, subjective wellbeing, and personal aspirations. Interest is growing in ability-based, patient-centered instruments, not confounded by health outcomes. The Quality of Life and Function Five Domain Scale (QFS-5) uses a multi-dimensional approach to measure QoL emphasizing abilities and life engagement. We describe the development and validation of the QFS-5 in a large sample of community-dwelling older adults. Methods: The validation sample comprised 1610 participants aged ≥ 50 from the Canadian Platform for Research Online to Investigate Health, Quality of Life, Cognition, Behavior, Function, and Caregiving in Aging (CAN-PROTECT). Internal consistency was assessed using Cronbach's alpha and item-total correlations. Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) evaluated domain structure. Criterion validity was tested through Pearson's correlation with the EuroQol-5D (EQ-5D). Convergent and discriminant validity were evaluated from associations with cognitive, mental health, and functional measures. Floor and ceiling effects were investigated. Results: The QFS-5 demonstrated excellent internal consistency (α = 0.92); CFA supported the proposed domain structure with strong item loadings. Criterion validity was confirmed with correlation of −0.61 against the EQ-5D; higher symptom burden on related scales were associated with lower QFS-5 scores. Floor effects were minimal, while modest ceiling effects were observed in some domains. No significant floor or ceiling effects were found in participants with frailty. Conclusion: Validity and reliability are established for this ability-based QoL scale, within a sample of mostly cognitively unimpaired, community-dwelling older adults. The QFS-5 aligns with EQ-5D, demonstrating potential clinical and research utility to measure relevant patient-reported QoL outcomes. Key Points: * The QFS-5 is a valid and reliable measure of quality of life, demonstrating excellent internal consistency, strong factor structure, and good alignment with the established EQ-5D. * The QFS-5 captures ability-based, patient-centered outcomes, supporting scale utility for research and clinical assessments.
Description: Data Availability Statement: The data that support the findings of this study are available on request from the corresponding author. The data are not publicly available due to privacy or ethical restrictions.
URI: https://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/33207
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/gps.70215
ISSN: 0885-6230
Other Identifiers: ORCiD: Zahinoor Ismail https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5529-3731
ORCiD: Dylan X. Guan https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7065-1963
ORCiD: Byron Creese https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6490-6037
Appears in Collections:Department of Life Sciences Research Papers

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
FullText.pdfCopyright © 2026 The Author(s). International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.911.26 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons