Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/33958| Title: | Operationalizing resilience for sustainable infrastructure governance across the life cycle |
| Authors: | Domaneschi, Marco Kopiika, Nadiia Di Bari, Roberta Cavallaro, Paola Villa, Valentina Argyroudis, Sotirios Mitoulis, Stergios-Aristoteles |
| Issue Date: | 7-Oct-2026 |
| Publisher: | Springer Nature |
| Citation: | Domaneschi, M. et al. (2026) 'Operationalizing resilience for sustainable infrastructure governance across the life cycle', Communications Engineering, 0(article in press), pp. 1–16. doi: 10.1038/s44172-026-00794-2. |
| Abstract: | Sustainability and resilience expectations for infrastructure are escalating faster than the regulatory frameworks meant to deliver them. This mismatch is most acute for ageing critical infrastructure. Yet, adaptation decisions remain fragmented because resilience and sustainability operate on fundamentally different temporal domains: resilience captures short-term recovery dynamics and service continuity. Instead, sustainability evaluates long-term impacts across their life cycle. Here, we depart from this temporally disjoined approach. Instead of analysing trade-offs between resilience and sustainability metrics separately, we introduce a unified decision-oriented framework that integrates short-term recovery dynamics, representing resilience, with long-term life-cycle performance, expressing sustainability, within a common optimisation structure that links these temporal dimensions. We formulate resilience as a recovery-based variable linked to retrofit implementation and integrate it with Life Cycle Assessment (LCA), Life Cycle Cost (LCC), and multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA) to support infrastructure decision-making across the life cycle. To the best of our knowledge, existing decision frameworks have not explicitly integrated resilience and sustainability across these temporal domains within a unified optimisation framework. Applied to a landmark ageing bridge, the framework evaluates six adaptation strategies under competing resilience, cost, carbon, and longevity objectives. Our results show that system level transformation with limited structural intervention can outperform conventional strategies, achieving stronger tradeoffs across resilience, environmental impact, cost, and service life extension. These findings provide actionable evidence for extending the lifespan of ageing infrastructure, while reducing environmental footprints. Thus, they offer a scalable pathway for aligning infrastructure adaptation with sustainability and resilience objectives under real-world constraints. |
| Description: | Data availability:
The datasets generated and analyzed during the current study, including the resilience assessment results, life-cycle assessment (LCA) and life-cycle cost (LCC) inventories and outputs, and multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA) results, are currently stored by the corresponding author and are available from the corresponding author (Stergios-Aristoteles Mitoulis; s.mitoulis@ucl.ac.uk) upon reasonable request. The publisher is sharing this article early to provide faster access to peer-reviewed, accepted research. It is citable and carries a permanent DOI. This version is subject to further edits and will be replaced automatically by the final Version of Record. All legal disclaimers apply. Supplementary information is available online at: https://www.nature.com/articles/s44172-026-00794-2#Sec16 . |
| URI: | https://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/33958 |
| DOI: | https://doi.org/10.1038/s44172-026-00794-2 |
| Appears in Collections: | Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering Research Papers |
Files in This Item:
| File | Description | Size | Format | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FullText.pdf | Copyright © Crown 2026. Rights and permissions: Open Access. This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. | 2.65 MB | Adobe PDF | View/Open |
This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License