Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/34072
Title: Invisibility problem: why current economic evaluations understate the value of sexual and reproductive health and rights, and three strategic shifts to address it
Authors: Narasimhan, Manjulaa
Rasanathan, Jennifer JK
Allotey, Pascale
Ahmed, Sayem
Crankson, Shirley
Banstola, Amrit
Pokhrel, Subhash
Issue Date: 20-Oct-2026
Publisher: BMJ Publishing Group
Citation: Narasimhan, M. et al. (2026) 'Invisibility problem: why current economic evaluations understate the value of sexual and reproductive health and rights, and three strategic shifts to address it', BMJ Global Health, 11(10), e024850, pp. 1–5. doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2026-024850.
Abstract: Summary box: • Most economic evaluations of sexual and reproductive health and rights (SRHR) interventions capture only health-sector benefits, rarely accounting for cross-sectoral returns in education, labour, justice and social protection. • A 27% reduction in global SRHR financing in 2023, compounded by donor withdrawal since 2025, driven mainly by geopolitical pressures, is undermining progress across health, education, economic development and equity goals. • Better evidence is unlikely to reverse decisions made on economic grounds, but evaluations that make cross-sectoral returns visible give ministries beyond health a demonstrable stake in SRHR investment and standing to defend it. • We propose three strategic shifts to make the broader returns on SRHR investments more visible: adopting multisectoral and societal rather than a uniquely health-sector perspective; embedding life-course and intergenerational analysis and applying disaggregated approaches to address equity concerns, including those enabled by emerging analytical methods.
Description: Data availability statement: Supplementary data is available from Reference 16. Ahmed S, Crankson S, Banstola A, et al. Summary data tables: a rapid scoping review of economic evaluations of sexual and reproductive health and rights. Brunel University of London 2025; doi:10.17633/rd.brunel.33455722
URI: https://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/34072
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2026-024850
Appears in Collections:Department of Health Sciences Research Papers

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
FullTime.pdfCopyright © World Health Organization 2026. Open access This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution IGO License (CC BY NC 3.0 IGO), which permits use, distribution,and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. In any reproduction of this article there should not be any suggestion that WHO or this article endorse any specific organization or products. The use of the WHO logo is not permitted. This notice should be preserved along with the article’s original URL.295.67 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons