Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/34128
Title: Economic and climate implications of diesel backup power in outage-affected countries
Authors: Liu, Fangjie
Shafique, Muhammad
Liu, Yixuan
Luo, Xiaowei
Keywords: chronic electricity outages;diesel backup power;outage resilience;cross-country heterogeneity;operating-energy cost;fuel-cycle greenhouse gas emissions
Issue Date: 28-Oct-2026
Publisher: Elsevier BV
Citation: Liu, F. et al. (2026) 'Economic and climate implications of diesel backup power in outage-affected countries', Sustainable Energy Technologies and Assessments, 95, 105497, pp. 1–14. doi: 10.1016/j.seta.2026.105497.
Abstract: Chronic electricity outages can shift the burden of unreliable grid supply to local backup generation, yet cross-country evidence on the scale and consequences of this shift remains limited. This study develops a harmonized framework for 56 outage-affected countries that links reported outage exposure, power-system scale, and empirical seasonal demand factors to retained-demand scenarios, and evaluates the consequences of supplying the resulting backup-electricity requirement with a standardized diesel benchmark. Using source observations with their documented reference years retained (WBES outages: 2006–2024; power-system and grid-lifecycle data: 2022–2024; monthly demand: 2024; diesel-price and exchange-rate evidence: 2025), the R20 reference modeling scenario (20% retained demand) yields an expected annual backup-electricity requirement of approximately 4.275 TWh across the 56-country sample. At a reference generator efficiency of 35%, diesel fuel-cycle emissions are estimated at 3.971 MtCO2e/year, compared with 2.123 MtCO2e/year for the corresponding grid lifecycle counterfactual, yielding a net additional climate burden of 1.849 MtCO2e/year. For the 26 countries with complete matched diesel-price, grid-tariff, and exchange-rate evidence, the net avoidable operating-energy cost is USD 306.9–484.4 million/year, where the range reflects admissible tariff branches rather than probabilistic uncertainty. Country-level empirical P05–P95 ranges describe seasonal variation, while retained demand, generator efficiency, tariff evidence, and upstream diesel pathways are evaluated separately as scenario, sensitivity, and structural-robustness dimensions. The results reveal strong cross-country heterogeneity and show that aggregate burden and per-unit impact structure do not necessarily move together. The framework provides a transparent benchmark for comparing outage-driven diesel burdens and for future assessment of resilience and lower-emission backup transitions without relying on composite vulnerability scores or policy-priority thresholds.
Description: Data availability: Data will be made available on request.
Supplementary data are available online at: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2213138826006831#s0155 .
URI: https://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/34128
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seta.2026.105497
ISSN: 2213-1388
Appears in Collections:Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering Research Papers

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
FullText.pdfCopyright © 2026 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an open access article under the CC BY license ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ ).7.42 MBAdobe PDFView/Open


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons