Functional significance of human female orgasm still hypothetical

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/5030

Full metadata record

DC Field	Value	Language
dc.contributor.author	Pound, N	-
dc.contributor.author	Daly, M	-
dc.date.accessioned	2011-04-15T14:28:37Z	-
dc.date.available	2011-04-15T14:28:37Z	-
dc.date.issued	2000	-
dc.identifier.citation	Behavioral and Brain Sciences 23(4): 620-621, Aug 2000	en_US
dc.identifier.issn	1469-1825	-
dc.identifier.uri	http://journals.cambridge.org/action/displayAbstract?fromPage=online&aid=65645	en
dc.identifier.uri	http://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/5030	-
dc.description	The official published version can be accessed from the link below - Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2000	en_US
dc.description.abstract	Human males are more polygamously inclined than females. However, there is substantial within-sex variation in polygamous inclinations and practices. This is acknowledged by Gangestad & Simpson but we pose the question: Is the target article's “strategic pluralism” pluralistic enough? In addition, we argue that the hypothesis that the female orgasm is an adaptation for post-copulatory female choice between rival ejaculates demands more research.	en_US
dc.language.iso	en	en_US
dc.publisher	Cambridge University Press	en_US
dc.title	Functional significance of human female orgasm still hypothetical	en_US
dc.type	Research Paper	en_US
Appears in Collections:	Psychology Dept of Life Sciences Research Papers

Files in This Item:

File	Description	Size	Format
Fulltext.pdf		42.86 kB	Adobe PDF	View/Open