Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/5030
Full metadata record
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Pound, N | - |
dc.contributor.author | Daly, M | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2011-04-15T14:28:37Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2011-04-15T14:28:37Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2000 | - |
dc.identifier.citation | Behavioral and Brain Sciences 23(4): 620-621, Aug 2000 | en_US |
dc.identifier.issn | 1469-1825 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://journals.cambridge.org/action/displayAbstract?fromPage=online&aid=65645 | en |
dc.identifier.uri | http://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/5030 | - |
dc.description | The official published version can be accessed from the link below - Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2000 | en_US |
dc.description.abstract | Human males are more polygamously inclined than females. However, there is substantial within-sex variation in polygamous inclinations and practices. This is acknowledged by Gangestad & Simpson but we pose the question: Is the target article's “strategic pluralism” pluralistic enough? In addition, we argue that the hypothesis that the female orgasm is an adaptation for post-copulatory female choice between rival ejaculates demands more research. | en_US |
dc.language.iso | en | en_US |
dc.publisher | Cambridge University Press | en_US |
dc.title | Functional significance of human female orgasm still hypothetical | en_US |
dc.type | Research Paper | en_US |
Appears in Collections: | Psychology Dept of Life Sciences Research Papers |
Files in This Item:
File | Description | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Fulltext.pdf | 42.86 kB | Adobe PDF | View/Open |
Items in BURA are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.