Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/8678
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorPinheiro-Torres, C-
dc.contributor.authorPortman-Smith, C-
dc.date.accessioned2014-07-15T09:59:23Z-
dc.date.available2014-07-15T09:59:23Z-
dc.date.issued2012-
dc.identifier.citationResearch Papers in Education, 27(2), 167-186, 2012en_US
dc.identifier.issn1470-1146-
dc.identifier.urihttp://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/02671522.2010.509514en
dc.identifier.urihttp://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/8678-
dc.descriptionThis is an Author's Accepted Manuscript of an article published in Research Papers in Education, 27(2), 167-186, 2012, copyright Taylor & Francis, available online at: http://www.tandfonline.com/10.1080/02671522.2010.509514.en_US
dc.description.abstractThis paper explores the evidence relating to how primary schools are responding to the ‘gifted and talented’ initiative in England and Wales. A questionnaire survey which invited both closed and open-ended responses was carried out with a national sample of primary schools. The survey indicated an increasing proportion of coordinators, compared with a survey carried out in 1996, were identifying their gifted and talented children as well as having associated school policies. However, the survey also highlighted a number of issues which need addressing if the initiative is to achieve its objective of providing the best possible educational opportunities for children. For example, it was found that a significant number of practitioners were not aware of the existence of the National Quality Standards for gifted and talented education, provided by the UK government in 2007, and the subject-specific criteria provided by the UK’s Curriculum Authority for identification and provision have been largely ignored. The process of identifying children to be placed on the ‘gifted and talented’ register seems haphazard and based on pragmatic reasons. Analysis of teachers’ responses also revealed a range of views and theoretical positioning held by them, which have implications for classroom practice. As the ‘gifted and talented’ initiative in the UK is entering a second decade, and yet more significant changes in policy are introduced, pertinent questions need to be raised and given consideration.en_US
dc.languageEnglish-
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherTaylor & Francisen_US
dc.subjectGifted and talenteden_US
dc.subjectPrimary schoolsen_US
dc.subjectPolicyen_US
dc.titleThe landscape of gifted and talented education in England and Wales: How are teachers implementing policy?en_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.doihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02671522.2010.509514-
pubs.organisational-data/Brunel-
pubs.organisational-data/Brunel/Administration and Support Staff-
pubs.organisational-data/Brunel/Administration and Support Staff/Administration and Support Staff-
pubs.organisational-data/Brunel/Brunel Active Staff-
pubs.organisational-data/Brunel/Brunel Active Staff TxP-
pubs.organisational-data/Brunel/Brunel Active Staff TxP/College of Business, Arts and Social Sciences-
pubs.organisational-data/Brunel/Brunel Active Staff TxP/College of Business, Arts and Social Sciences/Dept of Education-
pubs.organisational-data/Brunel/Brunel Active Staff/School of Sport & Education-
pubs.organisational-data/Brunel/Brunel Active Staff/School of Sport & Education/Education-
pubs.organisational-data/Brunel/Group Publication Pages-
pubs.organisational-data/Brunel/Leavers-
pubs.organisational-data/Brunel/University Research Centres and Groups-
pubs.organisational-data/Brunel/University Research Centres and Groups/Brunel Business School - URCs and Groups-
pubs.organisational-data/Brunel/University Research Centres and Groups/Brunel Business School - URCs and Groups/Centre for Research into Entrepreneurship, International Business and Innovation in Emerging Markets-
pubs.organisational-data/Brunel/University Research Centres and Groups/School of Arts - URCs and Groups-
pubs.organisational-data/Brunel/University Research Centres and Groups/School of Arts - URCs and Groups/Brunel Centre for Contemporary Writing-
pubs.organisational-data/Brunel/University Research Centres and Groups/School of Health Sciences and Social Care - URCs and Groups-
pubs.organisational-data/Brunel/University Research Centres and Groups/School of Health Sciences and Social Care - URCs and Groups/Brunel Institute for Ageing Studies-
pubs.organisational-data/Brunel/University Research Centres and Groups/School of Health Sciences and Social Care - URCs and Groups/Brunel Institute of Cancer Genetics and Pharmacogenomics-
pubs.organisational-data/Brunel/University Research Centres and Groups/School of Health Sciences and Social Care - URCs and Groups/Centre for Systems and Synthetic Biology-
pubs.organisational-data/Brunel/University Research Centres and Groups/School of Information Systems, Computing and Mathematics - URCs and Groups-
pubs.organisational-data/Brunel/University Research Centres and Groups/School of Information Systems, Computing and Mathematics - URCs and Groups/Multidisclipary Assessment of Technology Centre for Healthcare (MATCH)-
Appears in Collections:Education
Dept of Education Research Papers

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Fulltext.pdf515.9 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in BURA are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.