Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/26721
Title: Postural stability measures in healthy miniature Dachshunds obtained using a pressure mat and a force platform: a validity and reliability study
Authors: Shaheen, AF
Lins, D
Toledo, T
Gomez Alvarez, C
Keywords: validation;reliability;postural stability;postural sway;sway path;CoP;centre of pressure;canine;miniature dachshunds
Issue Date: 26-Jun-2023
Publisher: Biomed Central (part of Springer Nature)
Citation: Shaheen, A.F. et al. (2023) 'Postural stability measures in healthy miniature Dachshunds obtained using a pressure mat and a force platform: a validity and reliability study', BMC Veterinary Research, 19, 79, pp. 1 - 8. doi: 10.1186/s12917-023-03633-0.
Abstract: Copyright © The Author(s) 2023. Background: Miniature Dachshunds have a high prevalence of neurological and musculoskeletal diseases potentially affecting their balance. The postural stability of dogs in quiet standing is an indicator of postural control and can aid in diagnosing and monitoring lameness and other pathologies affecting balance. Measures of centre of pressure (CoP) can be obtained from force and pressure platform systems to evaluate postural stability, however the two systems have not been compared and the latter has not been validated in dogs. The aims of this study were to assess the validity and reliability of using a pressure mat compared to a force platform and report normative values of CoP measures in healthy miniature Dachshunds. Forty two healthy miniature Dachshunds of smooth, long and wire-haired breed types stood still on a pressure mat (Tekscan MatScan®) placed on a force platform and the two systems were synchronised. Maximum anterior-posterior (AP) and medial-lateral (ML) ranges, sway path and 95% area of a best-fit ellipse were computed. Bland-Altman plots and coefficients of correlation assessed validity; intra-class correlation coefficients (ICC) assessed inter-test reliability for both systems. Non-linear regression analyses were used to describe the relationship between CoP and demographic measures. Results: Strong correlations for AP range, ML range and 95% ellipse area and moderate correlation for sway path were found between the two devices. ICC showed good reliability (0.75–0.90) for AP range and moderate (0.5–0.75) for ML range and the 95% ellipse area for both devices. Sway path reliability was excellent (> 0.90) with the force platform but moderate with the pressure mat. Age was positively correlated with balance (inversely correlated with all measures except sway path), while weight explained 94% (force platform) and 27% (pressure mat) of the variance in sway path. Conclusions: Pressure mats can be used to obtain valid and reliable measures of CoP and replace use of force platforms. Older (non-senior) and heavier (non-obese) dogs show better postural stability. Clinical examinations should include the use of a range of CoP measures when assessing postural balance, while accounting for the effects of age and body weight.
Description: Data Availability: The datasets used during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
URI: https://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/26721
Other Identifiers: ORCID iD: Aliah F Shaheen https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2492-8818
79
Appears in Collections:Dept of Life Sciences Research Papers

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
FullText.pdfCopyright © The Author(s) 2023. Rights and permissions: Open Access. This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.1.42 MBAdobe PDFView/Open


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons