Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/29767
Title: The frail-LESS (LEss sitting and sarcopenia in frail older adults) remote intervention to improve sarcopenia and maintain independent living via reductions in sedentary behaviour: findings from a randomised controlled feasibility trial
Authors: Bailey, DP
Harper, JH
Kilbride, C
McGowan, LJ
Victor, C
Brierley, ML
Chater, AM
Keywords: sedentary behaviour;sitting;frailty;sarcopenia;physical function;feasibility study;behaviour change
Issue Date: 9-Sep-2024
Publisher: Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Citation: Bailey, D.P. et al. (2024) ‘The frail-LESS (LEss sitting and sarcopenia in frail older adults) remote intervention to improve sarcopenia and maintain independent living via reductions in sedentary behaviour: findings from a randomised controlled feasibility trial’, BMC Geriatrics, 24, 747, pp. 1 - 15. doi: 10.1186/s12877-024-05310-9.
Abstract: Background: Sarcopenia leads to functional disability, dependence in activities of daily living (ADL), and is a key contributor to frailty. Reducing and breaking up sedentary time is associated with improved sarcopenia and frailty-related outcomes. The aim of this study was to determine the feasibility of delivering and evaluating a remote sedentary behaviour intervention to improve sarcopenia and independent living in older adults with frailty. Methods: A two-arm randomised controlled feasibility trial was conducted with a target of 60 older adults (mean age 74 ± 6 years) with very mild or mild frailty. Participants were randomised to the Frail-LESS (LEss Sitting and Sarcopenia in Frail older adults) intervention or usual care control group for six months. The intervention included tailored feedback on sitting, standing and stepping; an education workbook that included goal setting and action planning; one-to-one health coaching; peer support; and a wearable device to self-monitor sedentary behaviour. Participant recruitment (percentage of eligible individuals recruited), retention and data completion rates were used to assess trial feasibility. Acceptability of the trial was explored through interviews and safety was evaluated via unplanned healthcare utilisation and number of falls. Sitting, standing, stepping and sarcopenia were measured to evaluate potential intervention effects. Results: Sixty participants were recruited. Recruitment and retention rates were 72% and 83%, respectively. Completion rates for outcome measures ranged from 70 to 100%. The trial was safe (< 1 fall per participant on average at each timepoint) and trial procedures were acceptable. Descriptive analysis (mean ± SD) showed that daily sitting was 25.1 ± 82.1 min/day lower in the intervention group, and 6.4 ± 60.5 min/day higher in the control group, at 6 months compared with baseline. Hand grip strength and sit-to-stand score were improved by 1.3 ± 2.4 kg and 0.7 ± 1.0, respectively, in the intervention group. Conclusions: This study demonstrates the feasibility and safety of delivering and evaluating a remote intervention to reduce and break up sitting in older adults with frailty. The intervention showed evidence towards reducing daily sitting and improving sarcopenia, supporting its evaluation in a definitive randomised controlled trial. Trial registration: ISRCTN registry (registration number: ISRCTN17158017). Registered 6th August 2021.
Description: The datasets supporting the conclusions of this article are available in Figshare, https://doi.org/10.17633/rd.brunel.26028892.v1. The raw qualitative data (transcripts) are not publicly available due to privacy restrictions. Further detail on the qualitative data and analysis that supports the findings of this study are available upon request to the corresponding author.
Electronic supplementary material is available online at: https://bmcgeriatr.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12877-024-05310-9#Sec40 .
URI: https://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/29767
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12877-024-05310-9
Other Identifiers: ORCiD: Daniel P. Bailey https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3772-630X
ORCiD: Cherry Kilbride https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2045-1883
ORCiD: Laura J. McGowan https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4054-9300
ORCiD: Christina Victor https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4213-3974
ORCiD: Marsha Brierley https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6806-6052
ORCiD: Angel Marie Chater https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9043-2565
747
Appears in Collections:Dept of Life Sciences Research Papers
Dept of Health Sciences Research Papers

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
FullText.pdfCopyright © The Author(s) 2024. Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.2 MBAdobe PDFView/Open


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons