The measurement of agitation in neurocognitive disorders: A systematic review

Abstract

Background Agitation is a common and distressing behavior in persons with neurocognitive disorders. However, efforts to understand and develop interventions for agitation, historically considered only as a symptom, have been complicated by heterogeneity in the definition, identification, and measurement of agitation. The International Psychogeriatric Association (IPA) developed and then validated a consensus clinical and research syndromic definition of agitation in cognitive disorders. The Neuropsychiatric Syndromes Professional Interest Area Agitation Work Group conducted a systematic review to identify validated measures of agitation used in older persons with neurocognitive disorders and to evaluate their alignment with IPA criteria.

Method This review was pre-registered on PROSPERO (CRD42023429494). We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, and PsycINFO from inception to June 30, 2023, using a search strategy that included term clusters for 1) neurocognitive disorders; 2) agitation; and 3) psychometric outcomes. Title/abstract screening was performed to include validation studies of original agitation scales in populations with neurocognitive disorders (e.g., mild cognitive impairment, dementia). The full texts of these studies were then reviewed to extract agitation scales. Scale instructions, items, and response fields for each scale were evaluated for alignment with IPA agitation criteria by at least three independent reviewers.

Result A total of 2103 unique search records were retrieved, of which 1877 were excluded at title/abstract screening. From the 226 full-text articles, 39 unique agitation scales were identified. The three scales containing agitation items that showed the greatest alignment with IPA criteria were the Staff Observation Aggression Scale, Neuropsychiatric Inventory Nursing Home, and Modified Overt Aggression Scale. Although all 39 scales included at least one item measuring verbal aggression, eight scales did not address excessive motor activity, and five scales did not include items for physical aggression.

Conclusion Numerous agitation scales have been validated in older populations with neurocognitive disorders. Yet, few fully align with the recently published IPA agitation criteria. Most commonly, scales did not adequately capture symptom persistence of at least two weeks or evidence of emotional distress. Additionally, scales varied widely in capturing individual IPA agitation domains of verbal aggression, excessive motor activity, and physical aggression.