Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/32412
Title: The Effect of Ergometer Cycling and Visual Foraging on Brain Function: A Pilot Study
Authors: Dkaidek, T
Dingley, A
Parsler, J
Broadbent, D
Szameitat, A
Bishop, D
Keywords: dual-task;executive function;exercise;fNIRS;prefrontal cortex
Issue Date: 1-Dec-2025
Publisher: PLOS
Citation: Dkaidek, T. et al. (2025) 'The Effect of Ergometer Cycling and Visual Foraging on Brain Function: A Pilot Study', PLoS One, 20 (12), e0336642, pp. 1 - 22. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0336642.
Abstract: Dual-task training comprising cognitive and physical components may enhance cognitive function, and increased prefrontal cortex activation may underpin these improvements. The aim of this pilot study was to examine the effects of cycling and visual foraging on executive function (EF). Twenty-seven participants (mean age 25.44 ± 4.31 years) completed four lab-based sessions, one in which their aerobic capacity (O2max) and baseline EF scores assessed were determined, and three randomized experimental conditions: ergometer cycling (EC), visual foraging (VF) and both combined (EC + VF). Participants’ EF performance was assessed at baseline, and pre-and post- intervention using the 2-Back task (working memory), the Flanker Task (inhibitory control), and the Wisconsin Card Sorting Task (WCST; task switching). Functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) and eye-tracking data were collected throughout each condition. Affective state was assessed via the Affect Grid. Repeated measures ANCOVAs, incorporating baseline EF task scores as covariates, revealed condition x time x covariate interactions for the Flanker task only; task performance of participants with poorer baseline scores improved more profoundly in the EC condition. Subjective arousal and prefrontal cortex (PFC) activation were higher in both cycling conditions relative to VF; hence, ergometer cycling, rather than visual foraging, might be the more impactful intervention in these regards. However, these elevations were not associated with EF enhancements; near-ceiling effects in EF task performance may explain this. The EC condition elicited greater energetic investment than the EC + VF condition; possibly because the secondary VF task distracted from the cycling exercise. PFC activation was only correlated with gaze fixations during the EC + VF condition, potentially reflecting concurrent increases in supply of, and demand for, oxygen during the combined condition.
Description: Data Availability: All relevant data are within the manuscript and its Supporting Information files.
Supporting information is available online at: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0336642#sec021 .
URI: https://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/32412
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0336642
Other Identifiers: ORCiD: Amelia Dingley https://orcid.org/0009-0004-6892-5904
ORCiD: David P. Broadbent https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5096-6522
ORCiD: André J. Szameitat https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9387-7722
ORCiD: Daniel T. Bishop https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7537-8559
Article number: e0336642
Appears in Collections:Dept of Arts and Humanities Research Papers
Dept of Life Sciences Research Papers

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
FullText.pdfCopyright: © 2025 Dkaidek et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.1.77 MBAdobe PDFView/Open


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons